![]() |
|
|
#89 | |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
2,861 Posts |
Quote:
I thought there was one on an island in the Missouri River, but after searching Google Earth, I cannot find it now. It was to be decommissioned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
13×17×29 Posts |
Quote:
It was permanently shut down October 24, 2016. It is being decommissioned. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
2,861 Posts |
Attached is an image showing all the riders on my service account. It seems residential users are on a three-tier billing system. I will hit the highlights here:
Total usage: 1,111 kWh. Fancy that number!
I would have thought the fuel adjustment would be higher than it is. Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2022-02-22 at 01:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 | |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
13×17×29 Posts |
Quote:
According to this article, San Diego Gas and Electric had to drop its high usage charge last year, per a ruling from the Utilities Commission. It seems utilities are adopting "time of use" billing... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
82110 Posts |
Quote:
Things may change in the medium term: the public is getting fed up with the continued rate increases due to mismanagement and regulatory capture. The investor-owned utilities might have exceeded the public's tolerance level for greed. I expect there will be ballot initiatives to modify the regulatory scheme, including changing the Public Utilities Commission's commissioners to directly publicly elected rather than appointed by the governor, as well as prohibiting ratepayers from being charged for management mistakes/malfeasance/negligence/criminal actions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
172208 Posts |
Typically end user power consumption is metered at the premises feed. Power lost in distribution before that meter is p=i2 Rline, higher than linear with end user demand. When demand is high, transmission and distribution lines physically sag because they heat and expand. R is an increasing function of temperature, not constant. Voltage at the meter will droop due to line voltage drop, so some loads will increase time averaged current to meet required power demand, raising line loss higher by increasing current for same power. Now if we could just find those 350+ Kelvin superconductors that cost less than copper...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Aug 2020
2·3·29 Posts |
NorCal is not that much better. I was on the PG&E flat rate with Tier 1 = $0.28, Tier 2 = 0.36, and Tier 3 = $0.44 and starting to hit Tier 3 rates consistently. It was hurting the pocketbook so much I had to switch to a time-of -use plan and turn off a couple computers to bring the cost down. I am still paying $0.31 most of the time and $0.40 between 5-8pm but am looking into using "PauseWhileRunning" in undoc.txt to idle the CPUs during the expensive time period. Anyone know of an easy way to pause mfaktc?
I created a spreadsheet to figure out how much I was spending (see attached picture) it is not a pretty one. Scratch San Diego off my list of places to move to. My brother moved to Texas where his electricity is only $0.12 per kWh but Texas is not big enough for the both of us... |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24×3×163 Posts |
Maybe you could try OK and feel superior ;)Two WI datapoints, normalized for a nominally 30 day billing cycle: Code:
a) rural electric cooperative (Riverland Electric Cooperative); we'd expect fixed charges to be higher because fewer subscribers per mile of line. Offsetting that somewhat is that farms could be high users, with 3-phase connections. Also profits eventually get distributed back to customers prorated by usage as "capital credits".
1) Metered-KWHR-Usage-independent factors:
Basic service charge $1.18/day x 30 = 35.40
Load management credit 1 water heater = -2.00 (they can drop load at peak times by radio signal)
High pressure sodium security light on their pole = $10.08 (they replace the bulb too)
Nontaxable facility charge $1.47
Metered-KWHR-Usage-independent subtotal $44.95 (cost for zero KWHR/30-days use)
2) Per-metered-KWHR:
Base rate $0.1208
Fuel adjustment -$0.0043
Net $0.1165 / kwhr
(No sales tax during heating season; 5.5% otherwise; 5% state, 0.5% county)
Marginal rate $/wattyear = $.1165/kwhr *365 * 24 / 1000 = $1.02054/watt/year now, 1.07667 later.
b) residential subdivision (Alliant Energy for-profit corporation)
1) Usage-independent factors:
Customer charge $0.4932/day * 30 = $14.80
State-wide low-income assistance fee = $3.15
Usage-independent subtotal $17.95 (before the first electron flows)
2) Per-metered-KWHR:
i) 2021:
Energy charge per metered kwhr: $0.11663
Fuel cost adjustment -$0.002593
Net $0.114037
(No sales tax during heating season; 5.5% otherwise; 5% state, 0.5% county)
Marginal rate $/watt-year =$0.99896... winter, $1.0539... summer.
ii) 2022:
Energy charge per metered kwhr: $0.13091
Fuel cost adjustment $0.
Net $0.13091
That's a 14.8% increase from 2021 to 2022, above double the government's claim of 7% inflation rate.
(No sales tax during heating season; 5.5% otherwise; 5% state, 0.5% county)
Marginal rate $/watt-year =$1.14677... winter, $1.2098... summer.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2022-02-21 at 14:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
2,861 Posts |
I just found an email from Duke Energy stating that my consumption, compared to the same date in 2021, is $13 USD less. Small miracle based on using my electric furnace a lot more.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 | ||
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
13·17·29 Posts |
Quote:
The high usage charge had "only" been 25%, which if it was 25% of the 47 cents rate, would have made the third tier $0.5875 per kwh. |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRP testing service | M344587487 | Cloud Computing | 19 | 2020-02-03 08:51 |
| Factoring as a service | Nick | Factoring | 8 | 2016-03-18 03:37 |
| NT service version 25 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 28 | 2008-12-08 08:32 |
| How to fix the Prime95 Service | E_tron | Software | 1 | 2003-10-05 03:55 |
| v22.9 service problem | PageFault | Software | 2 | 2002-09-26 01:35 |