mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2022-02-07, 23:59   #78
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

13×17×29 Posts
Default

My utility bill has the cost of the juice listed as the electric supply charge (a bit under 4.6 cents per kwh), and electric delivery charges. These include a "distribution delivery charge" of 3.2 cents per kwh, and flat rate "customer" and "meter" charges, which raise the delivery charges to more than the juice itself costs.

There are also taxes, fees etc. The total is shocking.

And then there's the natural gas part of the bill...
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-08, 00:29   #79
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

5·937 Posts
Default

Rates over here are about 25p/day for transmission and anything between 28p and 35p for a KWh (at the moment). The hike in the cost of electricity and gas is adversely affecting disproportionately millions of poor people who languish (while those in power and the rich seem to be magnamonous). My personal solution is to shut down completely all crunching in warmer months, have only a symbiotic relationship to my prime hunting hobby.

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2022-02-08 at 02:39
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-09, 16:39   #80
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

B2C16 Posts
Default

It seems I was incorrect about the cost. Considerably incorrect.

The statewide average here is $0.1285. Individual counties vary. Some of the more populated areas, like Indianapolis (Marion Co.), pay $0.13xx per kWh. Lower population density, $0.11xx per kWh. I do not know what the exact rate is for my county. Somewhere in between. The population here is somewhat more than any of the adjacent counties and a lot less than others farther away. The average monthly charge in the graphic is just about what I pay each month, except for January and February. There are currently 13 "riders" on my bill. Some sneak the cost up a little, and others down. Fuel cost, transmission loss, and so on. Most of Duke's stations are fossil fuel. A few are nuclear. I apologize for the fuss!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Duke.JPG
Views:	54
Size:	27.0 KB
ID:	26514  
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-09, 21:45   #81
bhelmes
 
bhelmes's Avatar
 
Mar 2016

19×23 Posts
Default

I pay 0,32 Euro / kwh in Germany, it is "ökostrom" means generated in Flensburg.
I think finding the next Mp will delight me a lot more.
The search for the next Mp seems to be difficult,
one good reason for a mathematician attitude is patience and endurance.


bhelmes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-09, 22:11   #82
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2·112·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhelmes View Post
I pay 0,32 Euro / kwh in Germany, it is "ökostrom" means generated in Flensburg.
I envy your provider's ability to interconnect. Here in little Bimshire, we are entirely self-sufficient with regards to electrons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhelmes View Post
I think finding the next Mp will delight me a lot more. The search for the next Mp seems to be difficult, one good reason for a mathematician attitude is patience and endurance.
Yup.

For you. Me. And many.

Should be Really Soon Now (RSN)...
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-09, 23:28   #83
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

2×112×47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Here in little Bimshire, we are entirely self-sufficient with regards to electrons.
I'm sorry everyone reading this...

My bad... I made a mistake. And I misspoke... I would like to apply a "delta" to my above.

Barbados is currently entirely /self-reliant/ for our GTD "power" (read: electrons). We are very far from self-sufficient. At the moment.

We are working to change that. Barbados is very likely to actually go carbon negative by 2030.

It's all a bit complicated. As are, I have found, most things.
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-11, 18:02   #84
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.

22·5·11·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
,,,Barbados is very likely to actually go carbon negative by 2030...
Geothermal, solar, wind, or nuclear, or a combination of any. Which do you think it might be?

Personally, I would not want to be confined to an island with a reactor going sideways. I can see them using solar and wind.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-11, 18:09   #85
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

6,793 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
... I would not want to be confined to an island with a reactor going sideways.
Depends upon the size of the island. Greenland is an island.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-11, 19:45   #86
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

782410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
Greenland is an island.
It's hard for me to imagine either commericially justifying a reactor. Greenland at 56,081 is less than one fifth the 287,708 population of Barbados. Although there are some small designs built.
https://www.power-technology.com/fea...ctors-4144463/
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-11, 22:38   #87
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

22·2,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
Depends upon the size of the island. Greenland is an island.
Some think New Zealand is not an island nation, rather a continent. So it would ok for them to have a nuke.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2022-02-12, 02:05   #88
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

144118 Posts
Default

Here in the good ol' USA, nukes on islands have been considered OK for a long time.

Amchitka Island, AK [Long Shot (1965, 80 KT), MILROW (1969, ~1 MT), Cannikin (1971, ~5 MT)] Oh, wait, those were bomb tests.

Three Mile Island, PA. As Meat Loaf sang, two out of three ain't bad.
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PRP testing service M344587487 Cloud Computing 19 2020-02-03 08:51
Factoring as a service Nick Factoring 8 2016-03-18 03:37
NT service version 25 Prime95 PrimeNet 28 2008-12-08 08:32
How to fix the Prime95 Service E_tron Software 1 2003-10-05 03:55
v22.9 service problem PageFault Software 2 2002-09-26 01:35

All times are UTC. The time now is 16:06.


Fri Jul 7 16:06:08 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 13:34, 0 users, load averages: 1.39, 1.16, 1.11

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔