![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
10001110112 Posts |
I am doing a PRP test on M332290099 (again after restarting after I gave up on it after a ton of Gerbicz errors and then went back to it but the save files were bad so the test restarted).
I noticed that it said "Iteration: 6645800/332290098" (SEE ATTACHED IMAGE.) I thought "weird, I never noticed in all this time that second number is 1 less than the exponent". But then I went home and checked on one of my home computers and the second number is definitely the exponent and not 1 less than the exponent. Did I run into a bug? Last fiddled with by JuanTutors on 2021-10-29 at 18:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
7,823 Posts |
No.
LL does p-2 iterations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas%...primality_test PRP does p-1 iterations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_primality_test Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-10-29 at 20:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
571 Posts |
Quote:
"Iteration: 203663120/332292529" "Iteration: 168611800/332316293" I see the same thing on my desktop. The number of iterations it states is the exponent. Last fiddled with by JuanTutors on 2021-10-29 at 22:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
101000001100112 Posts |
Probably (accidentally or intentionally) you selected from the menus "windows/show all workers in the same window". Scratch that. I misunderstood your question. Going for the morning coffee... ![]() Are you running same version of p95, and same test type? Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-10-30 at 04:31 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17×487 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
10738 Posts |
All running PRP. At home, I confirmed that my laptop running 2 instances that I took a picture of above is running 30.3 b6. I also confirmed that my desktop upstairs (not pictured) is running 30.5 b2 for some reason. The one at work that as one less iteration that I showed above is running 30.3 b6 according to mersenne.org, which I assume is accurate. I never checked a 4th computer.
I checked to see if I am running LL tests accidentally, but these are all PRP tests. I am sure you can check my username through mersenne.org to confirm. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17×487 Posts |
Looking at the code (which has not changed among all the versions you are using), the only way I see for the iteration counter to be one less than the exponent is to set
PRPStraightForward=1 in prime.txt. This disables Gerbicz error checking and proofs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
57110 Posts |
I will look to see if that is set when I get to that computer on Monday. However, I did not set that option manually. I didn't know that option existed, and the computer in question is the one that has been having problems, so I would not have set it up to avoid Gerbicz error checking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
201278 Posts |
You may need to send me prime.txt, local.txt, worktodo.txt, and a savefile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
571 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17×487 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Maximum core count support in latest Prime95 | avinashkv94 | Information & Answers | 9 | 2023-02-28 18:16 |
| Looks like it's down for the count | bcp19 | Hardware | 12 | 2013-04-26 13:52 |
| Prime count up | henryzz | Lounge | 7 | 2007-09-19 19:45 |
| Count of Matrices | davar55 | Puzzles | 2 | 2007-06-13 20:46 |
| Can't figure out how to count in DOS. | jasong | Software | 2 | 2006-07-22 21:49 |