![]() |
|
|
#1882 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2·3·5·19 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1883 | |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
10728 Posts |
Quote:
2004109083829816426995592902 = 2 * 3 * 281 * 29917 * 47269 * 8106041 * 103695649, so the biggest factor is 103695649, the exponent, which is bigger than B2=20264000. Is it possible it's not accounting for the special form of Mersenne factors, which allows ignoring P as a factor of Q-1 (Q is the factor found) and only using the general rules for factors found by the P-1 method? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1884 |
|
Jun 2003
116738 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1885 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2×3×5×19 Posts |
M1001159 has a 120.912-bit (37-digit) factor: 2500439903769890259112379635985290039 (P-1,B1=10000000,B2=1110000000)
Is it Christmas already? This one should come in at about 365th place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1886 |
|
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
23·52·13 Posts |
No, no, no, I have no budget for christmass right now. So it is NOT christmass. At least for another 6 month.
Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2021-06-10 at 10:30 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1887 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
23×1,223 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1888 |
|
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
260010 Posts |
M23554211 has a 114.027-bit (35-digit) factor: 21164767805799094411604254592575543 (P-1,B1=1200000,B2=79200000)
I also have a near Christmass time Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-06-13 at 04:23 Reason: fixin' wrong M[] tag |
|
|
|
|
|
#1889 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
We found both an 98.x and 101.x bits factors in 35.1M range,
They are not sync'd on James' site yet, but they are indeed very smooth! Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-06-13 at 10:02 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1890 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
23A16 Posts |
Your 98.x factor directs to 83.x factor and 101.x factor directs to 98.x factor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1891 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
100101100010112 Posts |
Fixed, thank you very much! (I didn't edit the quote in your post, only my post). I got lost in so many factors and links. But in this case, the 101 is not anymore "smooth". My mistake. As they were not yet on mersenne.ca at the time, I wrongly remembered their size (which is displayed when reporting), and I assumed the 101 was the smooth one (the "smoothness" is deduced from the amount of credit given, you don't need to do any calculation or to see the k value to know your factor is very smooth, hehe).
Therefore, to repair the damage, take this new 115 bits guy here...
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2021-06-13 at 10:11 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1892 | |
|
Sep 2002
14368 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A new factor of F11?! | siegert81 | FermatSearch | 2 | 2018-01-24 04:35 |
| A fond farewell | rogue | Lounge | 10 | 2008-11-21 05:25 |
| who can factor 10^100+27? | aaa120 | Factoring | 17 | 2008-11-13 19:23 |
| New factor | fivemack | ElevenSmooth | 4 | 2008-05-07 19:28 |
| Shortest time to complete a 2^67 trial factor (no factor) | dsouza123 | Software | 12 | 2003-08-21 18:38 |