![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2013
Germany
5516 Posts |
I've found four probable primes in the range 200001 <= n <= 500000:
Code:
n = 221628, 350071, 371696, 487291. The attached file should "prove" this assertion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2003
5,051 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2013
Germany
8510 Posts |
Any other in the specified range is meant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
4,643 Posts |
I see the OP has answered graciously.
I would have been tempted to answer "Yes." ![]() I point out If the attached file was supposed to prove that 10^n + 7 is composite for all other n, it would have been big news if it actually did that. (Especially since 10^n + 7 is prime for n = 1, 2, 4, 8, and 9). A proof that 10^n + 7 is composite for all n greater than 5000000 would also be big news. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Near- and quasi-repunit PRPs | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 10 | 2019-09-12 13:31 |
| Very (large) PRPs? | PawnProver44 | Information & Answers | 95 | 2016-05-20 18:24 |
| PRPs not prime | schickel | FactorDB | 1 | 2015-08-03 02:50 |
| Proven PRPs? | Random Poster | FactorDB | 0 | 2012-07-24 10:53 |
| PRPs that are composites | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 57 | 2011-09-12 12:31 |