![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
100000001000002 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jan 2017
32·11 Posts |
The second required property is completely meaningless as currently phrased. I assume it should say the numbers have to be at least 2.
Last fiddled with by uau on 2021-06-02 at 00:51 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·1,373 Posts |
What do you mean? That is the most important filtering criteria. Under a million, there are only about 40 numbers which suffice, and of them, less that a handful are prime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Oct 2017
5×23 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
11000001101002 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
The page has been edited to show "... > 1". Before it said "... ≥ 1" |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Jun 2012
22·13·59 Posts |
Fun problem. Believe I got a correct answer.
Anybody go for the bonus *? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Jan 2020
3610 Posts |
My bottleneck is primality proving.
I used YAFU implementation of APR-CL for solutions with less than 2k digits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
4,643 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Jan 2020
10002 Posts |
Solved it today, largest solution I found so far is greater than 10^545
Last fiddled with by Yusuf on 2021-06-23 at 05:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"Kebbaj Reda"
May 2018
Casablanca, Morocco
89 Posts |
Quote:
Go to the maximum yusuf. we compare our max after the solution. if you want? Last fiddled with by Kebbaj on 2021-06-24 at 22:52 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| June 2020 | tgan | Puzzles | 16 | 2020-07-05 22:21 |
| June 2019 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 5 | 2019-06-03 05:54 |
| June 2017 | R. Gerbicz | Puzzles | 14 | 2017-07-03 20:01 |
| June 2016 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 16 | 2016-07-07 02:51 |
| June 2015 | Batalov | Puzzles | 10 | 2015-07-07 14:59 |