![]() |
|
|
#606 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
100110001110002 Posts |
Cool.
BTW, James and Aaron have provided me a custom query to help with the strategic TC's. It is much faster to run than what I had been doing and provides the actual bit level of work done. I still have a few tweaks to do on my end. But, I have done all of the change over that I needed to do. |
|
|
|
|
#607 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
31·173 Posts |
Quote:
The CUDALucas interim residues agree with Gpuowl's to 120M and not at 121M and later. Unfortunately there are no interim residues available from the prime95 run. At least the gpuowl run is bad; the gpuowl run was switched from a slow RX550 to this gpu from ~118-119M onward, before I knew the Radeon VII was a reliability problem with Samsung vram and normal clocking. And it showed subsequent errors (only one shown here): Code:
2021-02-05 11:13:58 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121100000 63.07%; 1819 us/it; ETA 1d 11:50; 3db2811a3769b223 2021-02-05 11:17:00 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121200000 63.12%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:47; dfa4710b09887314 2021-02-05 11:17:00 roa/radeonvii 192000103 OK 121000000 (jacobi == -1) 2021-02-05 11:20:02 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121300000 63.18%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:45; e080991b83f850f4 2021-02-05 11:23:04 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121400000 63.23%; 1820 us/it; ETA 1d 11:41; 454b04a6033d8a77 2021-02-05 11:26:05 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121500000 63.28%; 1812 us/it; ETA 1d 11:29; 0000000000000002 2021-02-05 11:29:06 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121600000 63.33%; 1808 us/it; ETA 1d 11:21; 0000000000000002 2021-02-05 11:29:06 roa/radeonvii 192000103 EE 121500000 (jacobi == 0) 2021-02-05 11:29:07 roa/radeonvii 192000103 LL 121000000 loaded: b39483545c5a11f7 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-05-14 at 20:49 |
|
|
|
|
|
#611 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
10100111100112 Posts |
My old reliable GTX1060 came through on the CUDALucas TC of M192000103, matching the prime95 first test residue, in ~50.5 days nonstop.
Code:
Starting M192000103 fft length = 10752K | Date Time | Test Num Iter Residue | FFT Error ms/It Time | ETA Done | | Mar 28 22:45:36 | M192000103 500 0x11f10b6aa1920e65 | 10752K 0.17188 22.7582 11.37s | 50:13:46:16 0.00% | ... | May 18 10:32:10 | M192000103 192000000 0x093dc213992bf688 | 10752K 0.19531 22.7160 227.16s | 0:02 99.99% | M( 192000103 )C, 0x0c4ee3405f680447, 10752K, CUDALucas v2.06beta, estimated total time = 1211:42:15 |
|
|
|
|
#613 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
536310 Posts |
Took following, ETAs by ~May 30, barring system issues;
Cat 1 DoubleCheck=56446021,74,1 DoubleCheck=56848373,76,1 DoubleCheck=57139183,74,1 DoubleCheck=57308143,74,1 DoubleCheck=57357359,74,1 DoubleCheck=57458873,74,1 DoubleCheck=57538279,74,1 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-05-21 at 16:57 |
|
|
|
|
#614 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
230708 Posts |
List has been updated. Someone has been taking the exponents up a bit or 2.
|
|
|
|
|
#615 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
14F316 Posts |
Took the following:
2 unverified results Cat 1 DoubleCheck=57244697,74,1 DoubleCheck=57297659,74,1 As PRPDC: Exponents with 1 LL + 1 PRP result: PRP=1,2,84944921,-1 PRP=1,2,84969113,-1 PRP=1,2,85141577,-1 PRP=1,2,85427897,-1 PRP=1,2,86042767,-1 PRP=1,2,86961583,-1 PRP=1,2,87009059,-1 PRP=1,2,87051017,-1 PRP=1,2,87215537,-1 PRP=1,2,88102523,-1 PRP=1,2,88391669,-1 PRP=1,2,89023807,-1 PRP=1,2,89876881,-1 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2021-05-23 at 17:04 |
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that | jasong | Forum Feedback | 1050 | 2019-04-29 00:50 |
| Posts in limbo | 10metreh | Forum Feedback | 6 | 2013-01-10 09:50 |
| Ton of spam posts | jasonp | Forum Feedback | 9 | 2009-07-19 17:35 |
| Exponents assigned to me but not processed yet? | edorajh | Data | 10 | 2003-11-18 11:26 |
| 2000 posts! | Xyzzy | Lounge | 10 | 2002-11-21 00:04 |