![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2003
29410 Posts |
I have a question for those of you who have more experience with factoring ranges. I was wondering what percentage of exponents I can expect to eliminate by trial-factoring to 60 bits. And for those of you who are factoring past 60 bits, what percentage does each extra bit eliminate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
May 2003
25×3 Posts |
Well, I don't have a lot of experience yet, but I know it depends strongly on how far the range has already been factored.
In my range, it was factored to 58 bits and I'm factoring to 60 bits and I get about 90 factors found per range of 100.000 (from 30.000.000 to 30.100.000 for example). Axel Fox. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Dec 2002
Frederick County, MD
37010 Posts |
You can find out a lot of information about trial factoring here: http://www.mersenne.org/math.htm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE
24×173 Posts |
A simple rule is that factoring for n bits removes 1/n factors. So if you factor from 58 to 60 bits (2 bits only) you will find a factor every 2/60 = 1/30 exponents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
1E0C16 Posts |
For a thorough earlier discussion, see the thread "Does the LL test:s factorization save or waste CPU time?" in The Software forum at http://www.mersenneforum.org/viewtopic.php?t=78, especially svempasnake's table comparing the 1/n prediction to the actual number of factors found, on page 3 at Mon Sep 16, 2002 9:32 pm (http://www.mersenneforum.org/viewtop...highlight=#895).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPU Trial Factoring FAQ | garo | GPU Computing | 100 | 2019-04-22 10:58 |
| How far to do trial factoring | S485122 | PrimeNet | 1 | 2007-09-06 00:52 |
| over trial factoring | JFB | Software | 23 | 2004-08-22 05:37 |
| How to only do Trial Factoring? | michael | Software | 23 | 2004-01-06 08:54 |
| About trial factoring | gbvalor | Math | 4 | 2003-05-22 02:04 |