![]() |
|
|
#397 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
24×43 Posts |
I posted an update to the generate_maxlen.py script which revamps the CLI interface. It now uses the Python argparse standard library module, which makes it a lot nicer. I've also added support for specifying a max n in lieu of a max FFT length and moving the verbose flag to the CLI. It now has a built-in help message generated by the module, so check that for the details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#398 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
1011010110002 Posts |
Perhaps an admin should make a new thread for such script-related posts, better finding later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#399 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
24×43 Posts |
The (near-)Woodall k's listed in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=363 have been completed to n=425k. The following primes were found:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#400 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
12608 Posts |
I've completed the remaining RPS 9th and 10th Drive k's with missing ranges from n=325k to 350k. 14 primes were found, which are attached. I brought an old laptop into the fold, and I have a new Kubuntu Focus on the way, so this project (to n=400k) may be done by this summer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#401 | |
|
Aug 2020
4358 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by bur on 2021-03-01 at 09:53 Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#402 |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
23×3×112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#403 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
24×43 Posts |
To be clear, these are k's where near-Woodall and Woodall primes were found for larger n values, and I'm filling in the untested missing ranges. I'm not actually finding new primes of those forms, which are searched for largely by Steven Harvey and PrimeGrid, respectively.
Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-03-02 at 03:43 |
|
|
|
|
|
#404 |
|
"Dmitrii"
Mar 2021
St.Petersburg,Russia
5 Posts |
Reserving k=3317
|
|
|
|
|
|
#405 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
12608 Posts |
As of March 27, the (near-)Woodall k's listed in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...&postcount=363 have been completed to n=450k. The following primes were found:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#406 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
Quote:
Happy, From a year ago...was this done? I'd like to go ahead and double-check k=14549535 for all n<=300K and then test it up to n=500K. Is that OK? Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2021-04-06 at 03:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#407 |
|
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City
24×43 Posts |
Funny you mention that. I had started work on that k in late February, but I had suspended work on my local PRPNet servers for a bit in March to work on the GIMPS PRP-CF-DC backlog. I have since resumed work on both clients. That k is currently at n=288k, and I should get to n=300k by the end of this week. You can take over from there.
Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2021-04-06 at 19:02 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best Work for Finding Primes | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 9 | 2012-06-24 13:50 |
| Which settings to choose for best work? | jmb1982 | Software | 2 | 2009-04-07 09:33 |
| Help test 210885 - Find a new top 5000 prime! | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 121 | 2008-01-03 08:47 |
| Help test 2995125705 - Find a new top 5000 prime! | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 538 | 2007-05-08 01:42 |
| The fastest way to a top-5000 prime? | lsoule | 15k Search | 13 | 2005-09-19 20:24 |