![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2005
Copenhagen, Denmark
12116 Posts |
I am new here and was just wondering: Aren't you guys doing the same sieving stuff as projects like www.seventeenorbust.com (their sub-project about sieving) and www.rieselsieve.com?
Are the three of you sieving the same ranges or have you picked some each? Or am I just getting it all wrong? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3·277 Posts |
It is the same kind of work and the same program to do - but every project tests different numbers:
SoB: Proth numbers (k*2^n+1) with k < 78,557 RieselSieve: Riesel numbers (k*2^n-1) with k < IDon'tKnowAtTheMoment PSP: Proth numbers with prime k's (prime k's < 78,557 won't get checked again, of course) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
May 2005
Copenhagen, Denmark
28910 Posts |
Ahh... I see
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Nov 2002
43 Posts |
How does the work give divided up by the different projects, or does it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
Each project is working on disjunct candidates, so there is no need to divide work.
An exception can be seen in the prime k's of (potential) proth numbers < 78,557. These are necessary for PSP and SoB. But SoB was already way ahead when PSP was founded, so PSP stays away from these candidates and cheers everytime a SoB prime is of a prime k.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Going over 100% during sieving | wombatman | Msieve | 4 | 2013-07-11 15:41 |
| NFS sieving? | Dubslow | Factoring | 8 | 2012-09-28 06:47 |
| Line sieving vs. lattice sieving | JHansen | NFSNET Discussion | 9 | 2010-06-09 19:25 |
| 10^420 + 1 sieving | juno1369 | Factoring | 20 | 2010-04-28 01:11 |
| Sieving | robert44444uk | Sierpinski/Riesel Base 5 | 8 | 2005-04-02 22:30 |