![]() |
|
|
#342 | |
|
"6800 descendent"
Feb 2005
Colorado
32·83 Posts |
Quote:
That is where math fails me. 92% is close enough to 95% that I don't go there, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#343 | |||
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
101101111011002 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Alas, the nickname 'Nuke' was already taken by Tim Robbins' character in the (very fine, not like that other silly baseball movie starring Kevin Costner) baseball comedy Bull Durham. Quote:
Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2020-08-12 at 02:48 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#344 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego Coun
821 Posts |
Whoops!Gotta walk back part of my earlier statement. Friend informs me that he switched jobs a month ago and lost his utilities included situation, so he stopped using the RM850 I loaned him. Still worked fine, but runtime was 37 months. I wouldn't be comfortable running just any PSU so close the max, but the Corsair RM series and higher can actually live up to their ratings. Plus, the ratings are for 50C ambient, so the lower environmental temps give you a bit more headroom. |
|
|
|
|
|
#345 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22×2,939 Posts |
Quick update - all yesterday afternoon and evening was running the 4-GPU setup with sclk settings 3,3,3,1, TDP ~900w. Last night occurred to me that - based on previous sclk-fiddling - that using sclk = 3,3,2,2 would boost total throughput while leaving wattage more or less unchanged, did that a few hrs before going to bed, worked as desired. That ran stably overnight, but a few hrs ago tried upping one of those sclk = 2s to 3, that upped TDP to ~950w, but was not stable, the GPU whose clock I upped to 3 got shut down (I'm guessing by rocm?) after aroud an hour, and resetting it to sclk = 2 did not revive it (in terms of bringing it back out of idle mode), so rebooted, again running at sclk = 3,3,2,2. The more-ambitious 3,3,3,2 will need to wait for the missing ingredients for Frankencable #2 to arrive. But we are running all 4 cards at pretty decent clock settings, both of our systems are now "full up" in terms of running as many R7s as each system's PSU can plausibly support - 2 in the old ATX-case Haswell system, sclk = 4,3, TDP ~600w, 4 in the desktop open-test-frame build, sclk = 3,3,2,2, TDP ~900w. Outstanding - and my resulting electricity bills have of course been spectacular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#346 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22·2,939 Posts |
Assembled Frankencable #2 early this week - see attached pics. Sorry about the contrast issues - I put on a nearby windowsill in a misguided attempt to get better lighting. Pic 1 is as initially assembled, PSU plug at lower right, 8-pin PCIe power-out plug at top. Pic 2 shows after a bit of zip-tying, now PCIe power-out plug at far left.
But ... after rigging up a 2nd GPU the same way as the one using Frankencable #1 - one 8-pin PCIe power-out plug from a regular 8-pin power cable, the other via Frankencable - the system proved unstable, even at the sclk = 3,3,2,2 mix I'd been using with just the one Frankencable, which yields TDP ~= 900w. The mysteries of PSU power ... anyhow, yanked the 2nd Frankencable, just gonna run with the one at the aforementioned settings, unless another bright idea occurs to me. :) Last fiddled with by ewmayer on 2020-08-21 at 19:46 |
|
|
|
|
|
#347 |
|
Aug 2020
37 Posts |
Interesting times with the announcement of the new RTX 3080/3090/3070 cards. Retailers are dumping their 2080 S and ti cards at 50% the price and I see a lot of used Radeon VII coming back on the market. I had two slots to spare on a newly build rig: an Asrock H110 pro BTC+, a reused Intel i7-7700 with 16GB, a new Corsair 1600i PSU and a reasonably priced rack case for 6 GPU's. I replaced the six Chinese fans with 5 new Enermax D.F. Storm fans because the high-pitch noise was unbearable. Then I moved three Radeon VII from separate desktop boxes in the rig. With the proper ventilation I could run them at full power. The empty slots were staring at me, so I am now filling them with second hand ones I try to get for about 500 € on Ebay. I now use the gpuowl pooling option which reduces the maintenance considerably. The new RTX 3080 is estimated to run PRP's faster than the Radeon VII, but I am somewhat skeptical about that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#348 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
5×937 Posts |
A nice looking rig with a great PSU. Send us another picture when you've installed the other R VII's, I particularly like the way the disk is just hanging about!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#349 |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
Not U. + S.A.
3×953 Posts |
An interesting setup. At 900W TDP, it would cost 85 USD per month, at my service rate, to run it. This is for 120VAC. I don't know what he's using.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#350 |
|
Aug 2002
2×32×13×37 Posts |
Where are the 2080 cards for half price?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#351 | |
|
Jul 2009
Germany
2·353 Posts |
Quote:
Mod: Please stop with Bolding all of your messages. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2020-09-11 at 23:14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#352 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
468510 Posts |
amazon.co.uk has some cheap secondhand Radeon VII, cheap compared to eBay offerings, including one for £340. There are ones for £240.
I just snapped one up. Another 40-core equivalent card is winging its way to me.
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2020-11-05 at 03:09 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 | ET_ | GPU Computing | 1 | 2019-07-04 11:02 |
| Radeon Pro Vega II Duo (look at this monster) | M344587487 | GPU Computing | 10 | 2019-06-18 14:00 |
| What's the best project to run on a Radeon RX 480? | jasong | GPU Computing | 0 | 2016-11-09 04:32 |
| Radeon Pro Duo | 0PolarBearsHere | GPU Computing | 0 | 2016-03-15 01:32 |
| AMD Radeon R9 295X2 | firejuggler | GPU Computing | 33 | 2014-09-03 21:42 |