![]() |
|
|
#650 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
381710 Posts |
Since there wasn't other interest, I'm working both ends of the orange area toward the middle now for base 162, so I guess that whole section can be attributed to me at the next update. They won't all be green yet, but some have already made the change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#651 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
337610 Posts |
I am performing preliminary work on Tables 220 and 284.
It appears 284^3 has merged. |
|
|
|
|
|
#652 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
11×347 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#653 |
|
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
27·5 Posts |
I'm really sorry.
It's totally impossible to do the update ! Already last week, it had been very laborious to scan factordb : it was very long compared to usual ! But today, I can't even scan base 3, it blocks for a while. It's very long for each exponent. I don't know what's going on ? This does not prevent us from continuing our calculations. But we have to watch the posts since post #640 of the last update to be sure not to do the same calculations as someone else. Thank you all for your help ! I will take into account all your requests in the next update. But this next update will only be partial if the problem remains ! Last fiddled with by garambois on 2020-11-01 at 10:01 Reason: additional clarification |
|
|
|
|
|
#654 |
|
May 2009
Russia, Moscow
258710 Posts |
Looks like someone flooded factordb with thousands of small composites.
http://factordb.com/stat_1.php |
|
|
|
|
|
#655 |
|
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
10100000002 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#656 | |
|
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
27·5 Posts |
Quote:
I don't know what to do ? Should I try again today ? Last week, there was a similar problem ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#657 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
73518 Posts |
There is work being done on the db and all sequences will rebuild when accessed at some point, so everything will be quite slow.
On a bright note, Syd has informed me that he has fixed the three broken sequences and all the base 72 issues, so once we are able to access it again in a reasonable way, you should be able to add the base 72 table. I haven't been able to verify anything and will be out today, but will check either later or tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#658 |
|
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
2·653 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#659 | |
|
"Garambois Jean-Luc"
Oct 2011
France
10100000002 Posts |
Quote:
Thank you very much for this very very very good news !!! A lot of thanks to Syd !!! I'm just going to do a quick update for the few bases for which you reported changes to me : bases 2, 3, 20, 21, 23, 162, 439, 496. For the addition of bases 72, 220 and 284, I will wait to hear from you...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#660 |
|
Sep 2008
Kansas
24·211 Posts |
I did some work on base 29. Bases 220 and 284 will be ready at the next update.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Broken aliquot sequences | fivemack | FactorDB | 46 | 2021-02-21 10:46 |
| Broken aliquot sequences | schickel | FactorDB | 18 | 2013-06-12 16:09 |
| A new theorem about aliquot sequences | garambois | Aliquot Sequences | 34 | 2012-06-10 21:53 |
| poaching aliquot sequences... | Andi47 | FactorDB | 21 | 2011-12-29 21:11 |
| New article on aliquot sequences | schickel | mersennewiki | 0 | 2008-12-30 07:07 |