![]() |
|
|
#430 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
32216 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#431 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
neeee... that is just a soup of exponents of mersenne primes...
3^2*5*7*127*(17+89+61*127) Hihihi
|
|
|
|
|
|
#432 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
152118 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#433 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2·401 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#434 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
6,793 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#435 |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2·401 Posts |
Here we go... 3,560,600,696,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
#436 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
13·17·29 Posts |
It is the first number of the form p# + 1 which is composite.
2 + 1 = 3, 2*3 + 1 = 7, 2*3*5 + 1 = 31, 2*3*5*7 + 1 = 211, and 2*3*5*7*11 +1 = 2311 are all prime, but 2*3*5*7*11*13 + 1 = 30031 is composite, 59*509 37 (and not that it is the first irregular prime) |
|
|
|
|
|
#437 |
|
"Ruben"
Oct 2020
Nederland
2·19 Posts |
37*3=111
New number 121 |
|
|
|
|
|
#438 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
13·17·29 Posts |
Nice try. Alas, the stated fact doesn't make 37 "special." Every prime p other than 2 or 5 divides some repunit. "Largest prime factor of smallest composite decimal repdigit" is rather contrived. Even "largest prime factor of decimal repdigit triangular number (666) would be better.
But the special property of 37 I have in mind is that it is the smallest prime having -- or not having -- a special property of recognized mathematical importance which is possessed by some primes. My apologies for not specifying this originally. And, as I already said, it's not that 37 is the smallest irregular prime. As to 121, it is (b+1)^2 or 11^2 in the usual notation of base-b numbers for any base b > 2. In decimal, 121 is also 4 less than a cube, 121 + 4 = 53. The only other such number that springs to mind is 4; 4 + 4 = 23. I'll take a guess that 121 is the largest square of an integer with this property. I renew my offering of 37 |
|
|
|
|
|
#439 | |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2×401 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#440 |
|
"Ruben"
Oct 2020
Nederland
2·19 Posts |
For 121, the property I had in mind was that it's the smallest composite number that must be counted as a possibility when calculating primes such that p=p"#n+x with x<p",
Note, I wrote the smallest composite, and not the smallest non-prime as 1 isn't composite, it is the only nonzero natural number with this property. I didn't find the property for 37, so I guess I can't suggest a new number |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do you think you're special? | MooMoo2 | Lounge | 26 | 2016-05-06 20:35 |
| Special Smooth numbers | Citrix | Other Mathematical Topics | 46 | 2012-03-06 14:55 |
| Special Circumstances | xilman | Soap Box | 5 | 2009-06-05 08:20 |
| Special n | kar_bon | Riesel Prime Data Collecting (k*2^n-1) | 1 | 2009-02-19 04:28 |
| am i special yet? | jeffowy | Miscellaneous Math | 2 | 2003-12-17 21:40 |