![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
I know it won't exactly scream along, but I'm looking for somewhere I can do well. Clock-for-clock, if not anything else.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
10,753 Posts |
Quote:
Assuming it has enough memory (I wouldn't recommend running on a machine with less than 128M) it will undoubtedly do useful work. I've used 300MHz PII machines productively while at MSR. The best approach, I suggest, is to suck it and see. Try running for a few days and see what happens. That would certainly be my approach if I had such a system. Paul P.S. The performance of NFS sievers tend to be much more correlated with efficiency of the memory architecture than the raw clock speed, so you may find that your machine out-performs on a clock-for-clock basis --- or you may not. Suck it and see remains my advice. Last fiddled with by xilman on 2005-06-11 at 13:43 Reason: Added PS about memory |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Jun 2003
The Texas Hill Country
44116 Posts |
At one time, cycle for cycle, my 450MHz G4 tower was fastest in our group.
It certainly wasn't all that fast in terms of overall throughput since its clock was less than 1/4th of the 2GHz of (at that time) "bleeding edge" machines. However, at half the competitive speed, its memory to cpu speed ratio was twice as good. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Mar 2003
New Zealand
13·89 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Special project #3b - Project 400 | schickel | Aliquot Sequences | 307 | 2011-10-28 01:29 |
| Special project #3a - Project 300 | schickel | Aliquot Sequences | 29 | 2011-08-12 17:45 |
| pi(x) project | ATH | Miscellaneous Math | 4 | 2006-08-30 17:59 |
| New Project? | edorajh | NFSNET Discussion | 1 | 2006-03-20 23:44 |
| new project ? | junky | NFSNET Discussion | 14 | 2004-06-03 08:59 |