Prime95 v30.3 - Page 25

jwnutter · 2020-09-10, 17:52

Understood, thank you George.

This may not be the correct place for this comment, but I have a P95 feature request. P95 appears to run a quick benchmark prior to starting PRP work - but I'm not sure if this is due to a user setting somewhere or if this occurs for everyone. Could P95 also start work following a user initiated benchmark? Maybe a new check box in the benchmark menu that allows the user to toggle this option on/off?

henryzz · 2020-09-10, 19:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwnutter

Understood, thank you George.

This may not be the correct place for this comment, but I have a P95 feature request. P95 appears to run a quick benchmark prior to starting PRP work - but I'm not sure if this is due to a user setting somewhere or if this occurs for everyone. Could P95 also start work following a user initiated benchmark? Maybe a new check box in the benchmark menu that allows the user to toggle this option on/off?

I think the way to do this would be to start work and then initiate a benchmark. The work would be resumed after the benchmark.

jwnutter · 2020-09-10, 19:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by henryzz

I think the way to do this would be to start work and then initiate a benchmark. The work would be resumed after the benchmark.

Ahhhh, very nice. I'll try that next time. Thanks!

kriesel · 2020-09-10, 21:07

Windows Vista 64 bit Home Basic Core2 Duo 6GB ram
(Prime95 V29.8b6 x64 ran on this system again after I woke it up from a long summer nap.)

Prime95 V30.3b5 win64 first impression:

Code:

Prime95.exe Entry Point Not Found
The procedure entry point K32GetModuleFileNameExA could not be 
located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll

Code:

Problem signature:
  Problem Event Name:    APPCRASH
  Application Name:    prime95.exe
  Application Version:    30.3.1.0
  Application Timestamp:    5f56f570
  Fault Module Name:    KERNEL32.dll!K32GetModuleFileNameExA
  Fault Module Version:    6.0.6002.18005
  Fault Module Timestamp:    49e0421d
  Exception Code:    c0000139
  Exception Offset:    00000000000b8fb8
  OS Version:    6.0.6002.2.2.0.768.2
  Locale ID:    1033
  Additional Information 1:    fa3e
  Additional Information 2:    ac0507478d1c5bd693cfc4fe3987e900
  Additional Information 3:    fa3e
  Additional Information 4:    ac0507478d1c5bd693cfc4fe3987e900

Read our privacy statement:
  http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=50163&clcid=0x0409

libhwloc-15.dll appears to be the current version.
09/10/2020 03:56 PM 1,753,095 libhwloc-15.dll (created 3/30/2020 5:31 pm)
Issue duplicated with b3, b2, b1.
Retreated to 29.8b6 for now.

Prime95 · 2020-09-10, 21:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by kriesel

Windows Vista Home Basic Core2 Duo 6GB ram
(Prime95 V29.8b6 x64 ran on this system again after I woke it up from a long summer nap.)

Prime95 V30.3b5 win64 first impression:

Code:

Prime95.exe Entry Point Not Found
The procedure entry point K32GetModuleFileNameExA could not be 
located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll

.

This is a result of upgrading to Visual Studio 2019 (from MSVC 2005)

MS docs at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/win...ulefilenameexa suggest a work-around. I will try that for build 6.

Prime95 · 2020-09-11, 03:27

Build 6 is now available.

kriesel · 2020-09-11, 06:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by kriesel

Windows Vista 64 bit Home Basic Core2 Duo 6GB ram
...
Issue duplicated with b3, b2, b1.

For v30.3b5, same applies to Windows Vista Business 32-bit on Pentium M 2GB ram.
And XP 32 bit on Pentium M 2GB ram says it is not a valid Win32 application.
Will retry with b6 when time allows.

James Heinrich · 2020-09-11, 10:23

The Test > Status... dialog can only display a certain number (depending on worker count) of assignments per worker, however I speculate that the ETA is calculated for all the assignments in worktodo. P-1 ETA is slightly expensive to calculate. If I have a large number (hundreds) of small P-1 assignments it takes a long time to display the status dialog, even though it's only displaying the ETA status for 8x2 of them.

storm5510 · 2020-09-11, 13:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Prime95

Build 6 is now available.

I always look at the dates of the libraries to see if any are new. I have not been extracting any of them with each new release. Perhaps you could mention if any need to be replaced.

JuanTutors · 2020-09-12, 04:12

I'm starting a new 100M PRP test in about 30 days. This version of P95 seems to be coming along strongly. Should I switch to this version of P95 when the next exponent starts?

Prime95 · 2020-09-12, 04:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by JuanTutors

I'm starting a new 100M PRP test in about 30 days. This version of P95 seems to be coming along strongly. Should I switch to this version of P95 when the next exponent starts?

Switch now. It should be backward compatible. (but make a backup just to be safe).

2020-09-10, 17:52	#265
jwnutter "Joe" Oct 2019 United States 1001100₂ Posts	Understood, thank you George. This may not be the correct place for this comment, but I have a P95 feature request. P95 appears to run a quick benchmark prior to starting PRP work - but I'm not sure if this is due to a user setting somewhere or if this occurs for everyone. Could P95 also start work following a user initiated benchmark? Maybe a new check box in the benchmark menu that allows the user to toggle this option on/off?

2020-09-11, 03:27	#270
Prime95 P90 years forever! Aug 2002 Yeehaw, FL 7,537 Posts	Build 6 is now available.

2020-09-11, 10:23	#272
James Heinrich "James Heinrich" May 2004 ex-Northern Ontario 11×311 Posts	The Test > Status... dialog can only display a certain number (depending on worker count) of assignments per worker, however I speculate that the ETA is calculated for all the assignments in worktodo. P-1 ETA is slightly expensive to calculate. If I have a large number (hundreds) of small P-1 assignments it takes a long time to display the status dialog, even though it's only displaying the ETA status for 8x2 of them.

2020-09-12, 04:12	#274
JuanTutors Mar 2004 2²·3³·5 Posts	I'm starting a new 100M PRP test in about 30 days. This version of P95 seems to be coming along strongly. Should I switch to this version of P95 when the next exponent starts?