![]() |
|
|
#254 | |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
2×5×293 Posts |
I'm glad I decided to test a low disk space situation.
![]() Quote:
I am certain I left mprime set to do LLDC because I figured others would be testing the new PRP hotness and thought someone should test the old. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
Apr 2004
1016 Posts |
Hi,
FYI and just for fun, 32-bit linux version works fine for my very, very old 32-bit machines (Athlon XPs ;) using ubuntu-mate 16.04 and Linux Mint Mate 19.2, but 32-bit Windows version 30.3beta4 and beta5 does not start on Windows XP and Windows 7, greetings. |
|
|
|
|
|
#256 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
11·311 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: prime95.exe Application Version: 30.3.1.0 Application Timestamp: 5f56f582 Fault Module Name: libhwloc-15.dll Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 5ab8b310 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Offset: 00007837 OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 0a9e Additional Information 2: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789 Additional Information 3: 0a9e Additional Information 4: 0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#257 |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
11×311 Posts |
Something odd with the Test > Status... dialog. I realize that Prime95 will attempt to do Cert work first and therefore out-of-order compared to how it's shown here and in worktodo.txt but I don't understand why the ETA for all the Cert work is exactly the same. Bug?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#258 |
|
"Joe"
Oct 2019
United States
1148 Posts |
A question and a comment related to v30.3 b4.
Question: Can someone direct me to the HT options in v30.3 b4? For some reason I'm unable to find this menu in b4, but I recall seeing it during the initial setup. Comment: I recall someone had an issue with a missing check in the "get occasional proof certification work" field. I too had the same issue but caught the problem before I closed the worker window. My specific issue resulted from an errant mouse click at the bottom of the worker window. After a little investigation I found that the user can modify this checkbox by clicking up to (from left to right) approximately the red vertical line shown in the image below. Last fiddled with by jwnutter on 2020-09-09 at 18:01 |
|
|
|
|
|
#259 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
11·311 Posts |
Test > Worker Windows... sets the number of workers, CPU cores to use (multithreading) in that dialog set the number of threads per worker.
The settings for actual hyperthreading is under Options > Resource Limits... > Advanced... > Use hyperthreading for ___ checkboxes at the bottom. Note however that hyperthreading is explicitly not recommended (other than for TF, which itself is not recommended for CPUs): Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#260 | |
|
"Joe"
Oct 2019
United States
22·19 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#261 | ||
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,537 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#262 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
5,419 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...19&postcount=5 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-09-09 at 18:19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#263 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
7,537 Posts |
A new Windows annoyance! As a developer one must leave extra space after the text so that the text is not truncated when different system fonts are used (maybe not as much extra space as I allocated). MS also has an annoying habit of changing the system font with new Windows releases that can lead to dialog box text getting truncated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#264 | |
|
Apr 2004
24 Posts |
Quote:
new libhwloc from their homepage solved the problem for beta 4 and 5, greetings. |
|
|
|
|