mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-08-18, 05:35   #12
Cheetahgod
 
May 2020

110102 Posts
Default

I got the gpu today in the mail. It was packaged in a thin layer of bubble rap in a gray plastic bag. The frame was badly bent and a tantalum cap from the back of the card was loose in the package. Despite this I was able to bend it back and get the card working. Getting 270 Gz days per day trial factoring with mfaktc.

Last fiddled with by Cheetahgod on 2020-08-18 at 05:36
Cheetahgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 10:01   #13
aheeffer
 
Aug 2020

3710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
For toe-dipping, entry level brand new GTX 1650 would be the better value. The performance difference (absolute and power efficiency) in mfaktc between 10xx & 16xx is no joke.
Indeed, I have one running and with some tuning I get a constant 825 Ghz-d/days.
aheeffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 14:37   #14
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

782410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aheeffer View Post
Indeed, I have one running and with some tuning I get a constant 825 Ghz-d/days.
Sounds a little low to me. Did you mean to type 925?

Running two instances:
Code:
Aug 18 09:04 |  495  10.6% | 767.00   7d14h |    467.10    92725    n.a.%
and
Code:
Aug 18 09:04 | 2796  60.7% |  7.068  44m25s |    434.72    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2800  60.8% |  7.039  44m07s |    436.51    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2805  60.9% |  7.135  44m36s |    430.63    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2808  61.0% |  7.451  46m27s |    412.37    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2817  61.1% |  7.073  43m58s |    434.41    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2820  61.3% |  7.134  44m14s |    430.70    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2821  61.4% |  7.450  46m04s |    412.43    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2833  61.5% |  7.067  43m35s |    434.78    92725    n.a.%
~923 combined.

This is with GPUSieveSize=2047.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 20:07   #15
Cheetahgod
 
May 2020

2×13 Posts
Default

No I am getting 270 Gz/day. How do I change the sieve size. I am using a sieve size of 82485.
Cheetahgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-18, 22:54   #16
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

24×3×163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetahgod View Post
No I am getting 270 Gz/day. How do I change the sieve size. I am using a sieve size of 82485.
See https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...99&postcount=8 and your mfaktc.ini file for tuning.
I would get typically over 500 GhzD/day TF on my gtx1060 with a single instance.
May 20 23:15 | 4612 99.9% | 12.162 0m12s | 514.71 106037 n.a.%
May 20 23:16 | 4615 100.0% | 12.167 0m00s | 514.50 106037 n.a.%
no factor for M110016017 from 2^75 to 2^76 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs]

My preceding message was in reply to aheefer regarding a gtx1650, for which 825 GhzD/day may be right if power is being limited for efficiency.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-19, 01:11   #17
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

155816 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
Running two instances:
Code:
Aug 18 09:04 |  495  10.6% | 767.00   7d14h |    467.10    92725    n.a.%
and
Code:
Aug 18 09:04 | 2796  60.7% |  7.068  44m25s |    434.72    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2800  60.8% |  7.039  44m07s |    436.51    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2805  60.9% |  7.135  44m36s |    430.63    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2808  61.0% |  7.451  46m27s |    412.37    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2817  61.1% |  7.073  43m58s |    434.41    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2820  61.3% |  7.134  44m14s |    430.70    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2821  61.4% |  7.450  46m04s |    412.43    92725    n.a.%
Aug 18 09:04 | 2833  61.5% |  7.067  43m35s |    434.78    92725    n.a.%
~923 combined
I see 467+430 = 897 ?
axn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-19, 02:41   #18
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

11110100100002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
I see 467+430 = 897 ?
Whoops, must not have been fully awake yet.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-19, 19:29   #19
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

2×5×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
See https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...99&postcount=8 and your mfaktc.ini file for tuning.
Wow TIL, thanks. I got a 9% increase on the recompiled version with GPUSieveSize=2047 (up from 128) on a RTX2070 (non-super)!!!

(Downloads are here and then pick a version ending in "-2047.zip")
Runtime Error is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-19, 20:19   #20
Cheetahgod
 
May 2020

2×13 Posts
Default

The P106-90 has half the cores as the regular gtx 1060.
It has 768 cores whereas the 1060 has 1152 (3gb) or 1280 (6gb).
I was able to get 300 ghz/day by increasing the clock speed. Changing gpusieve has little affect on the speed.

Last fiddled with by Cheetahgod on 2020-08-19 at 20:20
Cheetahgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-19, 21:41   #21
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

24·3·163 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheetahgod View Post
The P106-90 has half the cores as the regular gtx 1060.
It has 768 cores whereas the 1060 has 1152 (3gb) or 1280 (6gb).
I was able to get 300 ghz/day by increasing the clock speed. Changing gpusieve has little affect on the speed.
My gtx1060 is a 3gb with no overclock, 514.6GhzD/day, and that's running at reduced power, 60W not the 140W max.
514.6 /1152 * 768 ~ 343 GhzD/day predicted for your P106-90.
I got around 330. after tuning a GTX 1050Ti.
kriesel is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-08-23, 07:54   #22
Cheetahgod
 
May 2020

1A16 Posts
Default

I download the 2047 version and replaced the exe with the previous one. I then changed GPUSieveSize from 64 to 2047. I am not getting any significant improvement. Does this look right? At about 295 with the gpu overclocked by 200mhz and memory 600mhz
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Annotation 2020-08-23 005208.png
Views:	146
Size:	119.4 KB
ID:	23145  

Last fiddled with by Cheetahgod on 2020-08-23 at 07:58
Cheetahgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Udoo x86 + GeForce GTX 1060 SELROC GPU Computing 0 2018-11-20 06:52
GTX 1060 3GB storm5510 Hardware 15 2018-05-11 00:19
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 - PCIe 2.0 vs. 3.0 chaoz23 GPU Computing 7 2017-08-03 08:40
Chile mining rescue davieddy Soap Box 5 2010-10-27 02:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 15:24.


Fri Jul 7 15:24:20 UTC 2023 up 323 days, 12:52, 0 users, load averages: 1.02, 1.06, 1.08

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔