processed dc and tc posts

[S485122]

Originally Posted by kruoli

Somehow, it got TF assigned without any need. The exponent is already factored one level farther than GPU72 standard.

And it is in double-check CAT 1 range, it should not have been assigned for TF through the Manual Testing pages.

Jacob

[ATH]

There is something wrong with TF assignments in the DC range as we have seen recently.

Someone could do a TC without assignment ID, but post here first in that case to avoid several people doing it.

[Uncwilly]

I think so too. I posted in the PrimeNet server is broke thread.

[Uncwilly]

Originally Posted by kruoli

Somehow, it got TF assigned without any need. The exponent is already factored one level farther than GPU72 standard.

Are you doing a DC anyway? If not I will.

[kruoli]

Yes, I'll be running it. Not started yet, but very soon.

[kruoli]

Originally Posted by ATH

This one needs a TC: 53301539

My run confirmed your result.

[ATH]

Originally Posted by kruoli

My run confirmed your result.

Thanks. I was >99% sure already since the Tesla P100 on Colab pro has ECC memory.

[danc2]

For my account -- Danc2 -- I have a few errors from a couple of modified primenets I have been working on (the errors have been fixed, and we will now have primenet for CUDALucas). I was told posting here is the place to have these fixed in primenet.

Duplicate Submissions

Manual testing	104923657	C-LL - Mismatch	2020-07-01 14:20	0.0	BDDD133B975F23__	472.5208
Manual testing	104923657	C-LL - Mismatch	2020-07-01 14:20	0.0	BDDD133B975F23__	472.5208

Triple Submissions

Manual testing	104923649	C-LL - Factored	2020-07-01 08:20	0.0	82CFA7515D5B1AE1	472.5207
Manual testing	104923649	C-LL - Factored	2020-07-01 08:20	0.0	82CFA7515D5B1AE1	472.5207
Manual testing	104923649	C-LL - Factored	2020-07-01 08:20	0.0	82CFA7515D5B1AE1	472.5207

Errant Submissions

Danc2	108928711	P-LL	2020-08-06 21:41	0.0	M108928711 is prime!	0.2924

I do apologize again for these... and as I said the bugs have been fixed and hopefully they are a necessary evil for us to get a new functioning primenet for CUDALucas.

[Runtime Error]

@ Danc2

I'm happy to run these (104923657 & 108928711) as PRPs with the new VDF check to help clear the deck. It looks like @ewmayer has run the first as PRP but judging by the date it probably doesn't have a proof file. I'll P-1 the later too. It should take a couple of days.

(Unfortunately I wasn't able to reserve them. If someone finishes them first, so be it.)

[Uncwilly]

RTE, that will settle the prime/not-prime status, but not if the initial run was correct if it was not prime on the first one.

The triple submission of one with a factor is a non-issue for us here. The server verified that it is a factor. So, we know it is not prime.

BTW, PrimeNet is the server. Prime95, mprime, CUDALucas, etc. are the programs.

[Runtime Error]

Right right.

Also, I grabbed a dozen off the bottom. (13 of you count the one that was already done somehow)

DoubleCheck=88722407,76,1
DoubleCheck=88727773,76,1
DoubleCheck=88790237,76,1
DoubleCheck=88798639,76,1
DoubleCheck=88807379,76,1
DoubleCheck=88808789,76,1
DoubleCheck=88827503,76,1
DoubleCheck=88903769,76,1
DoubleCheck=88906319,76,1
DoubleCheck=88828589,76,1	<--- someone did this one already
DoubleCheck=88911799,76,1
DoubleCheck=88945781,76,1
DoubleCheck=88976267,76,1

Edit: I'm running them as PRP-VDF instead of LL, but they are reserved as LL-DC. Thanks!