![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
11001000002 Posts |
Hi again all,
Please look at the following conjecture. Note that in mathematics, conjecture means 'probably true'. Conjecture about irrational numbers Let k be an arbitrary chosen counting number. Consider S = sqrt(a0) + sqrt(a1) + ... + sqrt(ak). Where a0, a1, ... , ak are square free positive integers. Conjecture that S is therefore irrational. This might be an open question. For what its worth Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
140648 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
25×52 Posts |
k=0 is an excellent choice.
From the rational root theorem, we have that the square root of any positive integer that is not itself a perfect square, is irrational. Consider an example with k=1. Let S1 = sqrt(2) + sqrt(3) I am pretty sure that S1 is irrational. However, I do not know how to prove this. Regards, Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36·13 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
22×1,549 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
14408 Posts |
A google search of
"Is square root of 2 plus square root of 3 rational" helped me find a webpage at proofsfromthebook.com The restriction on the a_i is that the numbers are Positive and not squares. So zero is not allowed in this conjecture. The various a_i must be in the set {2,3,5,6,7,8,10, …} Regards, Matt Last fiddled with by MattcAnderson on 2020-07-18 at 09:06 Reason: added some set notation for clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7×1,373 Posts |
There is a recent Mathologer video about this. Quite nice to watch, actually (don't look to his eyes!
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Feb 2017
Nowhere
110438 Posts |
Since 1 is the only squarefree positive integer that is also a square, you could specify that ai is squarefree, and ai > 1 for every i from 0 to k.
Assertion: If no non-empty product of the ai is a square, then the numbers 1, sqrt(a0), sqrt(a1), ... sqrt(ak) are linearly independent over Q (field of rational numbers). [This assertion implies your result.] Sketch of proof: Let p1, p2, ..., pr be distinct prime numbers such that ai divides the product p1p2...pr for i = 0 to k. The extension K = Q(sqrt(p1), sqrt(p2), ... sqrt(pr)) is of degree 2r over Q. For each subset s of S = {1, 2, ...r} let Ps be the product of the primes pi, i in s. Then there are 2r products Ps. These products include 1 (empty product) and all the ai. Every element of K can be expressed as a Q-linear combination of these 2r products. They are, therefore, a Q-basis for K, hence linearly independent over Q. Thus any non-empty subset is also linearly independent over Q. Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2020-07-18 at 11:49 Reason: xifnix ostpy |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
31·173 Posts |
I took his description to be sum of k terms.
The sum of 0 terms would be 0. S=sum over 0 to k of sqrt(k). Depending on whether you test before or after summing, you get 1 or 0 terms. But 0 as a term may be as disqualified as 1. k=0 would seem to be excluded by "counting number". Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-07-18 at 16:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
25×52 Posts |
I learned something.
The mathologger video about irrationals was helpful. Wolfram Alpha has a command called MinimumPolynomial(). You input an expression, which can have square roots, and it will give you the monic polynomial with minimal degree, that has a root that is the argument in the command. This with the integer root theorem shows the irrationality of the expression S = sqrt(a0) + sqrt(a1) + … + sqrt(ak) and require all ai >2, and integer and not a perfect square. Done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Matthew Anderson"
Dec 2010
Oregon, USA
25·52 Posts |
oops, I meant to allow 2 for any ai with 1>= i >= k
Also, a related conjecture is Let S2 = q + sqrt(r). where q is any rational number and r is and integer and not a square and greater than one. show that S2 is irrational. Regards, Matt |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Irrational Integers :) | a1call | Miscellaneous Math | 16 | 2017-05-13 22:50 |
| ECM question for mersenne numbers | LaurV | Math | 11 | 2012-03-16 12:10 |
| Does Bush think God's irrational? | jasong | Soap Box | 8 | 2006-05-22 17:32 |
| Question on unfactored numbers... | WraithX | GMP-ECM | 1 | 2006-03-19 22:16 |
| Implementing the Irrational-base discrete weighted transform | ColdFury | Software | 14 | 2003-06-20 01:26 |