![]() |
|
|
#23 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
536310 Posts |
Quote:
Care to post an executable? (Most of us don't have working CUDA build environments or CUDA app programming or build experience.) Did you preserve the nonzero offset present in CUDALucas? Maybe CUDAWagstaff should have its own thread at some point. The speed with which you adapted it to both Wagstaff and PRP suggests you could also produce CUDAPRP (Mersenne numbers tested by PRP on CUDA) without huge effort. CUDAPRP with pseudorandom offset would be a nice gpu complement to Gpuowl. And possibly even run on older CC2.x or 3.x level cards that can't run Gpuowl, take a long time to do an assignment and so may produce more errors that CUDALucas won't catch. Your time to spend how you like, of course. (I could make some runs for you in exchange.) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status of Wagstaff testing? and testing Mersenne primes for Wagstaff-ness | GP2 | Wagstaff PRP Search | 414 | 2020-12-27 08:11 |
| gpuowl: runtime error | SELROC | GpuOwl | 59 | 2020-10-02 03:56 |
| gpuOwl Windows setup for Radeon VII | Prime95 | GpuOwl | 91 | 2019-12-30 08:30 |
| gpuowl tuning | M344587487 | GpuOwl | 14 | 2018-12-29 08:11 |
| How to interface gpuOwl with PrimeNet | preda | PrimeNet | 2 | 2017-10-07 21:32 |