![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jul 2019
3·5 Posts |
recently I use latest version of mprime 95 to test my mem kits, I found that if I choose large fft(test mem controller and ram), the core temp could went up to 80 degrees, almost the same as I use small fft(L1-L3, max temp) to stress cpu only.
so why it would be some much stress given to cpu when I stressing mem? Last fiddled with by jiangv on 2020-05-08 at 06:25 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
22·2,939 Posts |
Really good FFT implementations will stress both the CPU and the entire memory subsystem.
If your CPU has more than 4 physical cores you may well see less CPU stress for big-FFT since the memory typically can't keep up with the data demands of all the cores, but I'll defer to the owners of such systems to confirm or deny that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Jul 2019
3×5 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please provide me really large numbers to test manually | bosons | Factoring | 29 | 2019-11-12 13:58 |
| P95 PrimeNet causes BSOD; small FFTs, large FFTs, and blend test don't | KarateF22 | PrimeNet | 16 | 2013-10-28 00:34 |
| Does a large P-1 test eliminate need for ECM tests | UberNumberGeek | Factoring | 53 | 2009-07-11 08:24 |
| Small prime test divisor efficiency strategy | fenderbender | Math | 5 | 2007-07-18 18:39 |
| blend / small FFT torture test on linux ? | lukasz | Linux | 1 | 2007-01-09 16:16 |