![]() |
|
|
#4885 |
|
Sep 2017
USA
2×103 Posts |
Again, thanks. I had anticipated potentially spending a couple hours figuring it out, but wow that was super easy. I really appreciate how streamlined it is! haha trial factorer go burrrrr
A few of questions: 1) How can I delete a Notebook Access Key instance on GPU72, along with the associated work? I created too many and I'd like to return the assignments before they become overdue. 2) Is there a way to request to TF exponents at the 332M prize wave front? (see kriesel’s above post; that exchange was the impetus for me to join the TF effort) 3) Is there a way to request consecutive bit levels on the same exponents? e.g. take something from 73 to 81 instead incremental bit levels on different exponents? It may sound silly, but it would make me feel more ownership over and attachment to the exponents that I’m factoring, and it would add to the excitement that I feel when finding factors. (omg it spent a day factoring it and just before my session expired… BOOM!!1) My pitch: You (chalsall) have said a few times that you like to give folks agency over their contribution 😉. 4) A request for anecdotal evidence (the plural of which is data): How do you get a T4? 5) Any tips on writing a Windows-runable script that launches a Colab instance (and hits "connect" + "run") every 24 hours? I've done similar things w/ Python, but I imagine someone has a more elegant solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4886 | |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2·4,909 Posts |
Quote:
And once you get one. Then do the trick of "Connect to hosted runtime" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4887 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×4,909 Posts |
It looks like my MISFIT is not able to get assignments in the 332M range. I am not in front of the machine in question, nor did I have time to investigate the issue. It still has days of assignments available, so no rush.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4888 | |||||
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
262716 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
However, don't worry about taking too many assignments. After an instance is terminated, any assignments which have not been worked are returned to the pool within half an hour. Those who have had work done on them are held until you spin up another instance. Quote:
I would appreciate feedback as to how deep people want to take these? 81 bits would take a while, but that's approaching optimal. Quote:
As a compromise, if you choose "LMH Depth First" you will consecutively get the lowest available candidate to take up to the next level. So while you won't "own" a particular candidate, you will be contributing to the first candidates to be released back to Primenet for LL assignment. Quote:
2. Patiently do the Factory Reset cycling trick until you get lucky. I would advise against this. For some reason, one of my accounts gets hit with the Recaptcha challenge every time I interact with it, so Google is aware some are going to be trying to automate this. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4889 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Your MISFIT was asking for work to take up to 74 bits. I have added a conditional such that it bumps up the pledge level to 76.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4890 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
)To speed things up, you don't even have to interrupt the executing Notebook. Just Factory Reset with your mouse, and then "Cntl-F9" to run all the Sections (usually, but annoyingly not /aways/, in order from the top). It can take up to five such cycles, but you will /eventually/ get something better than a P4 (~98% of the time). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4891 |
|
Sep 2017
USA
110011102 Posts |
Thank you for the helpful replies!
I've currently got two accounts using two notebooks each, running on the same machine (using different browsers). IP address doesn't seem to matter, nor does phone number on the associated account. It seems easy enough to get P100s, and I'll probably stick with them since T4s seem rare, although I did manage to get one! Wait, they give paid users lower quality equipment? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4892 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Yup. We don't understand it either...
BTW, for those really serious about LMH work... I've added another work-type: Nominal. This used to be called "Depth", and goes to 78 bits. What is now called "Depth" goes to 81 bits, which is where we'll release back to Primenet at. But, be aware this takes a long time! 17.5 hours on a P100: Code:
20200512_001400 ( 3:54): Starting trial factoring M332193xxx from 2^80 to 2^81 (737.12 GHz-days) 20200512_001404 ( 3:54): Exponent TF Level % Done ETA GHzD/D Itr Time | Class #, Seq # | #FCs | SieveRate | SieveP 20200512_001408 ( 3:54): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.1% 17h31m 1008.85 65.759s | 0/4620, 1/960 | 393.85G | 5989.4M/s | 82485 20200512_001611 ( 3:56): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.3% 17h29m 1007.84 65.825s | 12/4620, 3/960 | 393.85G | 5983.4M/s | 82485 20200512_001718 ( 3:57): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.4% 17h28m 1007.90 65.821s | 24/4620, 4/960 | 393.85G | 5983.7M/s | 82485 20200512_001823 ( 3:58): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.5% 17h28m 1007.27 65.862s | 25/4620, 5/960 | 393.85G | 5980.0M/s | 82485 20200512_001930 ( 3:59): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.6% 17h26m 1007.61 65.840s | 28/4620, 6/960 | 393.85G | 5982.0M/s | 82485 20200512_002035 ( 4:00): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.7% 17h27m 1005.67 65.967s | 33/4620, 7/960 | 393.85G | 5970.5M/s | 82485 20200512_002142 ( 4:01): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.8% 17h25m 1006.49 65.913s | 37/4620, 8/960 | 393.85G | 5975.4M/s | 82485 20200512_002247 ( 4:03): 332193xxx 80 to 81 0.9% 17h25m 1005.47 65.980s | 40/4620, 9/960 | 393.85G | 5969.3M/s | 82485 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4893 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
2×4,909 Posts |
I fixed my MISFIT. I just need to work to get it to keep less in queue. And on another machine MISFIT does not seem to fetch. It has let the queue empty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4894 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
I recently changed an 8 core i7 machine from running 2 P-1 workers with 4 cores, to 4 workers with 2 cores. In My GPU72 assignments and completed pages I only see the machine name and (2), (3), (4). When I noticed and checked the machine, which is doing nothing else at the moment, and found all 4 workers chugging away. I had it call PrimeNet just to make sure that was working.
I wonder if M_ (1)'s work is being credited.
Last fiddled with by kladner on 2020-05-12 at 05:58 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4895 | |
|
Sep 2017
USA
CE16 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |