![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1110111010012 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
10010111111012 Posts |
Ed-
I saw no more errors. All- We've reached Q=80M, so we're done! I'll cat and remdups these presently, and will post the number of unique relations we achieved as an edit to this post shortly. Thanks for your help, everyone! Stats: 137.4M unique relations, 59.6M duplicates. That's 197M total relations from Q=2-80M. Lots of these will duplicate the nfs@home run, but we'll still save a bunch of inefficient high-Q effort! Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2020-05-11 at 02:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Jun 2012
22·13·59 Posts |
Quote:
I wonder if a C200 is possible on 15e using this approach? Question for another day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4,861 Posts |
There's no doubt this approach makes C200-201 reasonable with 15e. If yield looks sketchy, we simply run Q=20-100M on I=16 rather than the A=30 that we chose for this job. We'd get 30% more relations -> 220M uniques before starting nfs@home. Or, if it proves faster, Q=20-150M on A=30 and then nfs@home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Jun 2012
57748 Posts |
Mike has withdrawn his reservation for postprocessing this job. Anybody interested in taking it on? I have a couple of i7s each with 32 Gb of memory but it would take months to finish this job on either rig.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
12FD16 Posts |
Sure, I can do it; I already have the CADO'ed relations anyway.
You can post the reservation for me. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team sieve for OPN - 70841^53-1 | RichD | NFS@Home | 26 | 2016-11-18 07:55 |
| Team sieve #22: c166 from 3270:620 | fivemack | Aliquot Sequences | 55 | 2011-02-15 23:01 |
| Team Sieve for 2995125705 | SlashDude | Riesel Prime Search | 78 | 2006-05-14 16:56 |
| Team Sieve | grobie | Riesel Prime Search | 3 | 2005-11-16 08:46 |
| Team Sieve of 210885 | SlashDude | 15k Search | 21 | 2003-12-23 16:31 |