![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Not sure if this or the PrimeNet subforum is the right place for this topic, but here goes...
Over the past several days, more than once I have been unable to obtain most types of manual GPU assignments. Of the preferred work range categories available in the drop-down menu, only "TF for 100M digit Mersenne numbers" works. The rest meet with a result like this one: Code:
aError code: 40 Error text: No assignment available for GPU trial factoring, cpu_id: Thanks for any info on this! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Jun 2003
125308 Posts |
I got some work in the 100m bits (not digits) range by giving:
Preferred work range: TF for first time LL Exponent rage: 95m to 105m Work preference: Lowest exponent Bit Level: 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
17·487 Posts |
A little history. This page was originally written to replace the heuristics GPU72 uses. GPU72 would still exist, but would basically relay requests to this page and return the assignments. GPU72 would no longer reserve huge blocks of TF assignments.
Given that goal, the server tracks what range of exponents it expects to be handing out for LL in the next 90(?) days. The GPUs would then TF those ranges as deep as possible - with assignments always given out to maximize the LL-time-saved vs. chance-of-finding-a-factor. Fast forward to today. GPU72 never changed over to this system. That is fine, Chris does a great job monitoring the various wavefronts, probably better than an algorithm I came up with 5 years ago. This page is now used only by a few non-GPU72 users. What has happened is GPU72 has reserved pretty much all of the next-90-day ranges (displayed on the bottom the web page). What you need to do is manually extend the top end of the LL range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
24·3·163 Posts |
Quote:
And please consider moving the upper limit of the gpu manual assignments page, to a level that will reduce or eliminate error 40. It used to be a rare occurrence, but lately it seems to be the default response. Currently the upper limit is 96M but needs to be manually increased to 101M every time to obtain any new manual TF assignments. Also lowest available exponent choice (instead of highest bits) I'd like saved from one assignment fetch to the next. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania
947 Posts |
Thanks everyone for the interesting background and the helpful tips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China
23·7 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
1015810 Posts |
The results show up for the individual users who got assignments from GPU72.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China
23·7 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
1137410 Posts |
Quote:
And, so you know, while no assignments are actually completed by this account, what happens is GPU72 "lends" out assignments to TF'ers, who submit the results back to Primenet (and so get the credits). This repeats (to ever higher bit-levels) until the candidate has either been factored, or it's been TF'ed as high as makes sense. They're then released back to Primenet to assign for either P-1'ing or FC'ing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
"Cassessory"
May 2017
Northern China
23·7 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ECM manual assignments and # of curves | hansl | Information & Answers | 5 | 2019-07-23 16:38 |
| Manual assignments cpu/generic vs gpu TF | kriesel | PrimeNet | 1 | 2019-06-04 15:00 |
| unable to fetch assignments | dragonbud20 | MISFIT | 2 | 2016-10-18 08:01 |
| On getting manual assignments | Qubit | PrimeNet | 2 | 2014-07-30 12:30 |
| Unable to migrate manual assignment to Primenet 5. | xode | PrimeNet | 14 | 2009-05-25 20:48 |