![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
Jan 2019
Florida
35 Posts |
I finally put together my 3950x, this is what I'm seeing, not exactly impressive maybe I'm missing something.
Specs: Asrock matx x570, 3950x, 4x16gb ddr4-3466 17-19-19 It's really weird this processor seldom jumps 10 degrees then goes back down, and jumps again. Temperature fluctuates a lot. This shouldn't happen, at least I didn't expect it to. Hope this helps anyone who's planning to buy one. Let me know if you want me to run any specific tests. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
What is the CPU cooling? I'm wondering about thermal interface issues.
Is this 4 channel memory? If so, I am in awe of such a system. EDIT: Well I am in awe, regardless.
Last fiddled with by kladner on 2020-04-18 at 05:18 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Jan 2019
Florida
F316 Posts |
Quote:
According to data given by others i.e. The Judger on the 3900x, it seems like 3950x is not a good choice economically speaking, at least for use in Prime95. Compared to his data on FFT around DC range I think 2880K, I'm only getting a max of 790iter/ms (12 cores) compared to his 850iter/ms on the 3900x. ![]() Cooler is the corsair h115i pro. Not sure why the temperature randomly spikes every 30 seconds or so, maybe its a ryzen thing, but guess will try to reapply thermal paste and see what happens. Take care, everyone. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
"name field"
Jun 2011
Thailand
41×251 Posts |
Re: the new title of thread, ("is the 3900x overkill?") - there is not overkill in distributed computing world. If you can afford the money for hardware and electricity, then the more hardware the merrier...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
11101101102 Posts |
Quote:
Zen2 (and probably all CPUs going forwards) act more like a GPU by automatically boosting when thermal limits allow. Under steady load I wouldn't expect a lot of temperature jumps, maybe the load isn't steady as a result of the disjoint L3 causing some unpredictable access times or maybe 10 degrees just isn't that big a jump. If you're in a testing mood you could try optimising for a 50M exponent with single channel memory, this would simulate quarter of a 3990X and answer part of this question ( https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=25463 ). The question also includes 90M and 332M exponents but unless you're particularly bored I wouldn't bother as GPUs are much better suited to large exponents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2·401 Posts |
Quote:
EDIT: I forgot to mention now I have it on 4,1 GHz overclock on all cores, and when I turn on Prime95, I set fans to 100%, and no fluctuations whatsoever under load. I should also mention that spiking occurred only when not under load on stock settings. Last fiddled with by Viliam Furik on 2020-04-18 at 15:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Jan 2019
Florida
35 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Here's some data on different FFTs, I switched to 3333mhz cas15 memory this time. Code:
Prime95 64-bit version 29.8, RdtscTiming=1 Timings for 2560K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.19 ms. Throughput: 840.80 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.14 ms. Throughput: 879.66 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.19 ms. Throughput: 838.49 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.26 ms. Throughput: 795.96 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.41 ms. Throughput: 708.21 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.52 ms. Throughput: 658.88 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.36 ms. Throughput: 734.25 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.47 ms. Throughput: 678.32 iter/sec. Timings for 3072K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.42 ms. Throughput: 703.88 iter/sec. Timings for 3072K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.42 ms. Throughput: 705.53 iter/sec. Timings for 3200K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.47 ms. Throughput: 678.45 iter/sec. Timings for 3200K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.45 ms. Throughput: 690.52 iter/sec. Timings for 3360K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.51 ms. Throughput: 664.09 iter/sec. Timings for 3360K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.46 ms. Throughput: 684.63 iter/sec. Timings for 3584K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.63 ms. Throughput: 614.33 iter/sec. Timings for 3584K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.56 ms. Throughput: 641.42 iter/sec. Timings for 3840K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.74 ms. Throughput: 575.05 iter/sec. Timings for 3840K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.70 ms. Throughput: 588.05 iter/sec. Timings for 4096K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 1.84 ms. Throughput: 543.58 iter/sec. Timings for 4096K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 1.76 ms. Throughput: 567.93 iter/sec. Timings for 4480K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.08 ms. Throughput: 481.58 iter/sec. Timings for 4480K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.05 ms. Throughput: 487.49 iter/sec. Timings for 4608K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.09 ms. Throughput: 478.69 iter/sec. Timings for 4608K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.13 ms. Throughput: 468.51 iter/sec. Timings for 4800K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.16 ms. Throughput: 462.00 iter/sec. Timings for 4800K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.08 ms. Throughput: 479.87 iter/sec. Timings for 5120K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.34 ms. Throughput: 428.14 iter/sec. [Sat Apr 18 19:22:58 2020] Timings for 5120K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.32 ms. Throughput: 431.55 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.68 ms. Throughput: 373.61 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.84 ms. Throughput: 352.25 iter/sec. Timings for 5600K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 2.85 ms. Throughput: 351.09 iter/sec. Timings for 5600K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.98 ms. Throughput: 335.68 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 3.16 ms. Throughput: 316.13 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 3.71 ms. Throughput: 269.34 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (12 cores, 1 worker): 3.45 ms. Throughput: 290.23 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 3.57 ms. Throughput: 280.42 iter/sec. Code:
Prime95 64-bit version 29.8, RdtscTiming=1 Timings for 2560K FFT length (12 cores, 2 workers): 1.95, 1.91 ms. Throughput: 1034.34 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.83, 1.82 ms. Throughput: 1096.38 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (14 cores, 2 workers): 1.86, 1.84 ms. Throughput: 1080.83 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (14 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.65, 1.63 ms. Throughput: 1216.80 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (16 cores, 2 workers): 1.70, 1.71 ms. Throughput: 1173.84 iter/sec. Timings for 2560K FFT length (16 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.63, 1.63 ms. Throughput: 1227.80 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (12 cores, 2 workers): 2.08, 2.04 ms. Throughput: 971.74 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 2.02, 2.00 ms. Throughput: 995.81 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (14 cores, 2 workers): 1.91, 1.94 ms. Throughput: 1037.88 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (14 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.73, 1.73 ms. Throughput: 1155.66 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (16 cores, 2 workers): 1.78, 1.79 ms. Throughput: 1119.54 iter/sec. Timings for 2688K FFT length (16 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.74, 1.73 ms. Throughput: 1154.92 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (12 cores, 2 workers): 2.23, 2.24 ms. Throughput: 895.77 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 2.22, 2.17 ms. Throughput: 910.38 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (14 cores, 2 workers): 2.07, 2.20 ms. Throughput: 938.82 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (14 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.95, 1.93 ms. Throughput: 1031.45 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (16 cores, 2 workers): 2.22, 2.22 ms. Throughput: 900.80 iter/sec. Timings for 2800K FFT length (16 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.93, 1.93 ms. Throughput: 1037.16 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (12 cores, 2 workers): 2.30, 2.29 ms. Throughput: 870.46 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (12 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 2.37, 2.31 ms. Throughput: 855.47 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (14 cores, 2 workers): 2.02, 2.18 ms. Throughput: 954.38 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (14 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.92, 1.91 ms. Throughput: 1044.36 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (16 cores, 2 workers): 1.92, 2.02 ms. Throughput: 1017.67 iter/sec. Timings for 2880K FFT length (16 cores hyperthreaded, 2 workers): 1.86, 1.84 ms. Throughput: 1082.63 iter/sec. Last fiddled with by dcheuk on 2020-04-19 at 00:38 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Core i9-10900X | scan80269 | Hardware | 14 | 2020-02-18 06:35 |