mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Data > Marin's Mersenne-aries

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-03-29, 20:13   #353
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·17·241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phillipsjk View Post
Let's see if it really finishes in 2 months as predicted.

My computer that can't seem to process 100M+ exponents in a timely manner may have found a niche with this thread.
You may want to grab the lowest exponents off the list. But, this might be your niche.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-03-30, 04:08   #354
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

52·73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runtime Error View Post
My question: is this working as intended?
Quote:
Originally Posted by phillipsjk View Post
Sounds like a bug. This may be vulnerable to a replay attack, since you will have access to the full residues.
It works as intended.

You are ok, right now I assume no action will be taken as long as you don't continue to do that. Sometimes we need triple and quadruple checks for "suspect" results (and there are ways to identify such, behind of what you see on the web), and it should be normal that people who do TC/QC tests get their credits.

On the other hand, if somebody tries to "inflate his credits" by repeatedly doing tricks like that, he will be very fast spotted by the wolves lurking here around (I mean human wolves, not bots ) who have nothing to do all day but watching what other users do (this is said with no disrespect!).

In general, fast advancing in tops is immediately spotted by somebody, and the fast runner will be dissected not only with the scalpel, but mostly with a handsaw too, hehe. We are kind of a "tough community" here. In the good sense, of course. In the past, when such profiteers were found, George used to adjust their credits into the negatives, so whoever tried to take advantage of the system would have to work for some weeks to reach zero, and start fresh again. So, beware

Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-03-30 at 04:23
LaurV is offline  
Old 2020-03-30, 16:36   #355
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

3×5×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
It works as intended.
Good to know, thanks!
Runtime Error is offline  
Old 2020-03-31, 15:29   #356
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

32×449 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
PRP=EDDC25414116177C4F046D79BE11A463,1,2,96365519,-1,76,0,3,1

Added the 2 extra arguments that can be in the assignment: ",3,1"

1,2,96365519,-1: Number to test: 1 * 296365519 - 1
76: Trial factored to 276
0: Not sure about this one. (Maybe if P-1 has been done or not? or how many PRP tests has already been done on the exponent?)
3: PRP base 3. This is always 3 as standard for normal GIMPS candidates.
1: PRP type 1. This can vary between 1-5, but mostly 1 or 4 for older gpuowl tests. Prime95 and newer gpuowl versions and Mlucas? default to type 1 (and Prime95 uses type 5 for PRP-CF tests on exponents with known factor(s)).

Both PRP base and PRP type has to be the same for the PRPDC test as the original PRP test.


PRP type from undoc.txt, the "(default is 5)" is only for PRP-CF tests, the type number is 1 on normal PRP tests.

Code:
PRP supports 5 types of residues for compatibility with other PRP programs.  If
a is the PRP base and N is the number being tested, then the residue types are:
1 = 64-bit residue of a^(N-1), a traditional Fermat PRP test used by most other programs
2 = 64-bit residue of a^((N-1)/2)
3 = 64-bit residue of a^(N+1), only available if b=2
4 = 64-bit residue of a^((N+1)/2), only available if b=2
5 = 64-bit residue of a^(N*known_factors-1), same as type 1 if there are no known factors
To control which residue type is generated, use this setting in prime.txt:
    PRPResidueType=n        (default is 5)
The residue type can also be set for PRP tests in worktodo.txt entries making
this option somewhat obsolete.
And also for base >3, some versions of gpuowl, PRP res type 0.
Gpuowl supported PRP res type was 1 for some versions, 4 for others, 1 currently.

Worktodo formats for all common applications are described in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-03-31 at 15:31
kriesel is offline  
Old 2020-03-31, 15:42   #357
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2·17·241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
And also for base >3, some versions of gpuowl, PRP res type 0.
Gpuowl supported PRP res type was 1 for some versions, 4 for others, 1 currently.

Worktodo formats for all common applications are described in https://www.mersenneforum.org/showpo...8&postcount=22
This is not a commentary thread. If you want to add info to the quoted post, send me a pm with the specific changes or an new version of that post. Your post that I have quoted will be moved or wished away into the cornfield.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-03-31, 17:40   #358
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

32×449 Posts
Default LL triple check needed

Doublecheck=126745771,80,1
Prime95 or mprime with Jacobi check, random offset is recommended for triple check.

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...6745771&full=1

Second run was on my generally very reliable GTX1080. Selected interim residues for check against triple check run follow. The log file contains such lines at 50,000-iteration intervals. Offset for the run: offset = 63381765.
Code:
|   Date     Time    |   Test Num     Iter        Residue        |    FFT   Error     ms/It     Time  |       ETA      Done   |
|  Mar 19  20:38:52  | M126745771   1000000  0x15edf96ca917718e  |  6912K  0.25000   6.5481  327.40s  |   9:12:49:49   0.78%  |
|  Mar 20  03:56:31  | M126745771   5000000  0xb051d166bd0d4b77  |  6912K  0.26367   6.5451  327.25s  |   9:05:54:55   3.94%  |
|  Mar 20  13:03:25  | M126745771  10000000  0xc78694fe47a6c290  |  6912K  0.26563   6.6095  330.47s  |   8:20:48:43   7.88%  |
|  Mar 21  07:19:05  | M126745771  20000000  0xe8b99fde161b0dc9  |  6912K  0.25627   6.5234  326.17s  |   8:02:45:13  15.77%  |
|  Mar 22  01:36:06  | M126745771  30000000  0x8086b6a513e02681  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5931  329.65s  |   7:08:36:49  23.66%  |
|  Mar 22  19:54:40  | M126745771  40000000  0xdb678d3e24b74ed8  |  6912K  0.25000   6.5796  328.98s  |   6:14:28:29  31.55%  |
|  Mar 23  14:14:22  | M126745771  50000000  0x0487c8c933f3b472  |  6912K  0.26563   6.6038  330.19s  |   5:20:17:48  39.44%  |
|  Mar 24  08:31:55  | M126745771  60000000  0x602d363d22b19738  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5840  329.20s  |   5:02:01:43  47.33%  |
|  Mar 25  12:33:21  | M126745771  70000000  0xeb8cda315394d739  |  6912K  0.28125   6.5855  329.27s  |   4:07:43:28  55.22%  |
|  Mar 26  06:46:58  | M126745771  80000000  0x15755ff86e6e458a  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5379  326.89s  |   3:13:24:54  63.11%  |
|  Mar 27  23:45:57  | M126745771  90000000  0x0754d138fd03932a  |  6912K  0.25000   6.5502  327.51s  |   2:19:07:16  71.00%  |
|  Mar 28  17:57:45  | M126745771 100000000  0x9adb1773be482891  |  6912K  0.25781   6.5468  327.34s  |   2:00:50:10  78.89%  |
|  Mar 29  12:07:57  | M126745771 110000000  0xbcb72ec2eb415862  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5203  326.01s  |   1:06:33:46  86.78%  |
|  Mar 30  06:20:06  | M126745771 120000000  0x78dfe475a7ee035a  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5534  327.67s  |     12:18:32  94.67%  |
|  Mar 30  15:25:57  | M126745771 125000000  0x128cef69ca9d362a  |  6912K  0.26172   6.5461  327.30s  |      3:11:06  98.62%  |
|  Mar 30  17:15:07  | M126745771 126000000  0x88825c2169f7f431  |  6912K  0.26563   6.5485  327.42s  |      1:21:38  99.41%  |
M( 126745771 )C, 0x86e0ae7fee07db__, 6912K, CUDALucas v2.06beta, estimated total time = 231:14:17
max error logged 0.29688
No separate error messages appear in the log file for this primality test.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-03-31 at 17:41
kriesel is offline  
Old 2020-03-31, 17:42   #359
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

32·449 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
This is not a commentary thread. If you want to add info to the quoted post, send me a pm with the specific changes or an new version of that post. Your post that I have quoted will be moved or wished away into the cornfield.
Hmm. See also posts 6 thru 8 by others.
kriesel is offline  
Old 2020-04-01, 00:23   #360
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

2×17×241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
Hmm. See also posts 6 thru 8 by others.
7-8 are in context to a current is and will be moved after a sufficient time. If you gander at the processed thread, you will see many such things over there. It is closed and so all of the posts were here.

6 is important for those that may claim PRP-DC's. I have thought about extracting content and moving it to post 4.
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-04-01, 00:54   #361
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

11010012 Posts
Default

Hi, I can take this one. Running it with manual testing in mprime on linux, but I've registered it with Prime95 on windows.

Quote:
Doublecheck=126745771,80,1
Edit: it says "mPrime95 please"... thought it was either mprime in linux or Prime95 on windows. Let me know if I should stop the test. Should be done in ~4 days

Last fiddled with by Runtime Error on 2020-04-01 at 01:43 Reason: what is mPrime95?
Runtime Error is offline  
Old 2020-04-01, 03:12   #362
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

200028 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runtime Error View Post
Edit: it says "mPrime95 please"... thought it was either mprime in linux or Prime95 on windows. Let me know if I should stop the test. Should be done in ~4 days
Just my either/or shorthand. Your good. Note Ken's list above. You can see how your run is matching.

Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2020-04-01 at 03:13
Uncwilly is offline  
Old 2020-04-02, 16:06   #363
Runtime Error
 
Sep 2017
USA

3×5×7 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
Note Ken's list above. You can see how your run is matching.
Noob question: How do I see these residuals? I'm running headless. Is there an option in mprime to write interim residuals to the results.txt or results.json.txt file?

Follow up: When manual testing, can we submit interim residuals to the server on the manual result turn in page somehow?

Thanks!
Runtime Error is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Posts that seem less than useless, or something like that jasong Forum Feedback 1050 2019-04-29 00:50
Posts in limbo 10metreh Forum Feedback 6 2013-01-10 09:50
Ton of spam posts jasonp Forum Feedback 9 2009-07-19 17:35
Exponents assigned to me but not processed yet? edorajh Data 10 2003-11-18 11:26
2000 posts! Xyzzy Lounge 10 2002-11-21 00:04

All times are UTC. The time now is 10:16.

Thu Jul 2 10:16:28 UTC 2020 up 99 days, 7:49, 0 users, load averages: 1.63, 1.85, 1.79

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.