![]() |
|
|
#56 | ||
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5·7·139 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
10011010100112 Posts |
Boinc users don't care if a factor is found or not, they want credits.
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Quasi Admin Thing
May 2005
11110001102 Posts |
Quote:
![]() It appears we currently have 25 users, some wich would be able to complete a test from 72 to 77 bit in little under 5 hours, so it might make sence to go all the way in one test, once Reb get familiar with what the worktodo lines should look like and how much fast equipment we actually have available through BOINC
Last fiddled with by KEP on 2020-03-23 at 21:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2·5·7·139 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3·17·97 Posts |
Quick question, how do you guys will avoid cheating?
Results are open even when you don't have an account on the BOINC project, example of an open result: http://srbase.my-firewall.org/sr5/re...ltid=387733930 Can you hide line ''no factor for M105256187 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.21 barrett76_mul32_gs]''? Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2020-03-23 at 22:04 |
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Feb 2012
the Netherlands
1110102 Posts |
I'm hoping you're just joking a bit. While it might be true for a certain amount of people, there are plenty of users willing to help certain causes (just like this forum), or like the ease of running the boinc-software. I also prefer the boinc method over scripts and/or manual assignment, purely because it's set-and-forget.
Last fiddled with by Stef42 on 2020-03-23 at 22:31 |
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
3×17×97 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by pinhodecarlos on 2020-03-23 at 22:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
100101100010102 Posts |
Whatever makes their wheels turn, but finding the "right" amount of factors is an indicator that the system is "sane" and that there is no "cheating" going on. If you do TF to 73 or 77, we would still expect a factor in 70..100 trials. If not, then something is fishy. This is not intended to accuse anybody, there were situations in the past when, after tweaking with the code, even PrimeNet used to lose/miss factors. So, watch carefully for a while.
Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-03-24 at 03:13 |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
May 2011
Orange Park, FL
3×5×59 Posts |
Will I be able to see the BOINC TF results somewhere on the Prime95 site?
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2×5×312 Posts |
Quote:
(edit: or maybe not... I can't find it in GPU72 list. Not updated yet, or different user name? Or is the anon user with ~100 assignments at the end of the top?) (edit2: ok, there is no user in GPU72 list that was created no long than a week ago and advanced fast, I guess we must wait for the list to update from PrimeNet) Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2020-03-24 at 03:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
230028 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chess World Championship Match -- 2013, 2014, 2016 | Raman | Chess | 34 | 2016-12-01 01:59 |
| mprime ETA and primenet "days to go" do not match | blip | Software | 1 | 2015-11-20 16:43 |
| less v4 reservations being made | tha | PrimeNet | 8 | 2008-08-14 08:26 |
| LL test doesn't match benchmark | drew | Hardware | 12 | 2008-07-26 03:50 |
| WE MADE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | eric_v | Twin Prime Search | 89 | 2007-01-23 15:33 |