![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Sam"
Jun 2019
California, USA
3×13 Posts |
I think I know the answers to my questions below, but would like some confirmation.
One of my machines has been running Cat 1 PRP assignments for a while, but a LL-DC result returned nearly 3 months ago was recently confirmed bad by a triple check. I noticed the next queued PRP assignment is in Cat 3. So did the bad LL-DC result cause the machine to be downgraded from Cat 1 to Cat 3 for PRP assignments? Also, per the assignment rule "Computer must have no expired assignments or bad or suspect results in the last 120 days" for Cat 2 and lower, and assuming my machine produces no more bad results going forward, does this mean that machine will sit in a Cat 3 "penalty box" for another month before being allowed back into Cat 2 and below? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
101100011011102 Posts |
Quote:
You've "parsed" the language correctly. I presume you've read it, but the PrimeNet Assignment Rules is the "human" translation of what George et al have codified for "the machine". |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Divides Phi" category | Batalov | And now for something completely different | 47 | 2021-06-24 21:48 |
| Any fast paths out of Category 3 purgatory | NookieN | PrimeNet | 9 | 2018-06-18 19:14 |
| Option to prefer higher category work? | Runtime Error | PrimeNet | 4 | 2018-01-07 20:20 |
| Assignment key | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 4 | 2012-09-24 15:34 |
| Old Assignment | Primeinator | PrimeNet | 4 | 2009-06-04 22:35 |