PRP DC treated as if it is a PRP first test

[kriesel]

https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...1182987&full=1
The first PRP test on this exponent was already completed by Preda more than a year ago; it issued to me as a PRP DC 5 days ago; yet it lists as a cat 0 assignment and expiring in 2 more days on my login's https://www.mersenne.org/workload/
I think it should be a cat 4 PRP DC. See https://www.mersenne.org/thresholds/
It will be several years before the LL DC assignment wavefront catches up to this level. (This DC would be done already except for the RadeonVII/Windows issue. See https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24938)
I definitely requested the work as a PRP DC manual assignment, for qualifying a newly installed Radeon VII.

[Prime95]

Probably a miscalculation in the workload web page.

If it actually does expire like a cat 0 assignment that would be a more serious problem.

[kriesel]

Originally Posted by Prime95

Probably a miscalculation in the workload web page.

If it actually does expire like a cat 0 assignment that would be a more serious problem.

I've moved it to a prime95 worker instance, so made it moot for the assignment in question. It will come up again now that I have a Radeon VII running (mostly).
Given the high reliability of gpuowl PRP with GEC, a discrepancy or high error rate on a PRP DC should be rare and with high reliability indicate a hardware/config issue.