![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Jean-Philippe"
Apr 2010
Provence, France
258 Posts |
Hello,
I would like to know ... the owners of Core i9-99?0X processors with a TDP of 165W, did Prime95 run on all the cores without the noise being unbearable ? Liquid cooling? which model ? How did you realize that ? Currently I have a Xeon E5-1660v2 with TDP 130W but it's ok. I would like to buy a Core i9-10980X 18 cores but I'm afraid of noise with the computer just beside me. Thank you ! Last fiddled with by Caffreys on 2019-10-24 at 19:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Sep 2016
22×5×19 Posts |
If you're not overclocking it, you can pop any large AIO on it and it'll stay quiet.
And if you intend to run LL on it, it'll be memory-bound anyways. So it won't be able to sustain a high power draw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Jean-Philippe"
Apr 2010
Provence, France
3×7 Posts |
But DDR4-2933 quad channel is probably enough for 18 cores at 3Ghz ?! no ? You mean that the cores will not be close to 100%-97% use ? Last fiddled with by Caffreys on 2019-10-24 at 19:06 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Sep 2016
17C16 Posts |
Quote:
The high core count Skylake X's aren't a good value for LL for this reason. You're probably better off with perhaps a 10-core and a maxed out memory overclock like 3600+ MT/s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Jean-Philippe"
Apr 2010
Provence, France
3·7 Posts |
Ok Thanks
In any case, the most powerful processor Skylake X does not exceed twice my Xeon E5-1660 v2 Ivy-Bridge; I will wait. Last fiddled with by Caffreys on 2019-11-01 at 12:21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Sam"
Jun 2019
California, USA
1001112 Posts |
How much throughput (ms/iter) for Prime95 are you getting with your Xeon E5-1660 v2?
Since this Xeon is paired with DDR3 memory, and Prime95 at the wavefront (FFT=5120K) is memory bandwidth bound with Intel HEDT systems, I believe a system using 10-core Skylake-X Core i9-9900X or the imminent Cascade Lake-X Core i9-10900X paired with quad-channel DDR4 memory at 2666/2933 (or higher with overclocking) and utilizing AVX-512 should be able to achieve at least 2X throughput vs. this Xeon. I am currently very tempted to go for i9-10900X myself, and pair it with DDR4-3600 or 3733 dual-ranked memory. If everything works out and the system is stable, I should have some throughput numbers for Cascade Lake-X to report in a while. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Jean-Philippe"
Apr 2010
Provence, France
3·7 Posts |
On my Xeon E5-1660 v2 16GB DDR3-1866 CL13
Prime95 v29.4 build 8 I get Code:
Timings for 5120K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 6.81 ms. Throughput: 146.80 iter/sec. Timings for 5120K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 39.46, 39.26, 39.17, 39.14, 39.26, 39.25 ms. Throughput: 152.85 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 6.96 ms. Throughput: 143.58 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 41.10, 41.08, 41.06, 40.85, 41.07, 41.08 ms. Throughput: 146.20 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 7.22 ms. Throughput: 138.49 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 42.77, 42.64, 42.71, 42.59, 42.61, 42.61 ms. Throughput: 140.67 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 8.22 ms. Throughput: 121.71 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 47.43, 47.71, 47.40, 47.41, 47.39, 47.38 ms. Throughput: 126.44 iter/sec. Timings for 6400K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 8.21 ms. Throughput: 121.79 iter/sec. Timings for 6400K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 48.78, 48.47, 48.53, 48.63, 48.49, 48.47 ms. Throughput: 123.55 iter/sec. Timings for 6720K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 9.08 ms. Throughput: 110.16 iter/sec. Timings for 6720K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 50.46, 50.22, 50.29, 50.51, 50.23, 50.22 ms. Throughput: 119.23 iter/sec. Timings for 6912K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 9.47 ms. Throughput: 105.65 iter/sec. Timings for 6912K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 60.51, 60.55, 60.52, 60.44, 60.56, 60.41 ms. Throughput: 99.17 iter/sec. Timings for 7168K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 9.67 ms. Throughput: 103.45 iter/sec. Timings for 7168K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 56.03, 55.93, 55.97, 55.71, 55.91, 55.84 ms. Throughput: 107.34 iter/sec. Timings for 7680K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 9.88 ms. Throughput: 101.21 iter/sec. Timings for 7680K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 58.60, 58.34, 58.41, 58.28, 58.18, 58.20 ms. Throughput: 102.85 iter/sec. Timings for 8000K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 10.28 ms. Throughput: 97.26 iter/sec. Timings for 8000K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 60.67, 60.15, 59.90, 59.90, 59.90, 60.36 ms. Throughput: 99.76 iter/sec. Timings for 8192K FFT length (6 cores, 1 worker): 11.29 ms. Throughput: 88.55 iter/sec. Timings for 8192K FFT length (6 cores, 6 workers): 65.59, 65.03, 65.35, 65.25, 64.88, 65.10 ms. Throughput: 92.03 iter/sec. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
193616 Posts |
On my i9-7940X v29.8 build 6
14 cores Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 2.264 ms., avg time: 2.428 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 2.430 ms., avg time: 2.611 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 2.458 ms., avg time: 2.618 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 3.308 ms., avg time: 3.422 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 3.051 ms., avg time: 3.149 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 3.122 ms., avg time: 3.233 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 3.198 ms., avg time: 3.288 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 3.545 ms., avg time: 3.618 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 3.757 ms., avg time: 3.827 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 3.995 ms., avg time: 4.049 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 3.996 ms., avg time: 4.055 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 3.930 ms., avg time: 3.985 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 4.352 ms., avg time: 4.400 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:05] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 5.064 ms., avg time: 5.122 ms. Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 2.755 ms., avg time: 3.041 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 2.996 ms., avg time: 3.247 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 2.923 ms., avg time: 3.139 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 3.911 ms., avg time: 4.110 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 3.428 ms., avg time: 3.609 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 3.530 ms., avg time: 3.778 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 3.587 ms., avg time: 3.857 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 3.899 ms., avg time: 4.051 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 4.099 ms., avg time: 4.303 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 4.294 ms., avg time: 4.521 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 4.290 ms., avg time: 4.423 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 4.239 ms., avg time: 4.369 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 4.649 ms., avg time: 4.829 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:06] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 5.334 ms., avg time: 5.495 ms. Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 7.925 ms., avg time: 8.047 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 8.665 ms., avg time: 8.795 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 8.333 ms., avg time: 8.461 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 10.930 ms., avg time: 11.065 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 9.617 ms., avg time: 9.722 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 9.649 ms., avg time: 9.755 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 9.852 ms., avg time: 9.981 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 10.337 ms., avg time: 10.458 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 10.916 ms., avg time: 11.003 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 11.681 ms., avg time: 11.786 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 11.404 ms., avg time: 11.501 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 11.503 ms., avg time: 11.572 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 12.227 ms., avg time: 12.312 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 14.015 ms., avg time: 14.114 ms. Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 4.291 ms., avg time: 4.472 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 4.669 ms., avg time: 4.883 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 4.483 ms., avg time: 4.645 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 5.911 ms., avg time: 6.080 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 5.124 ms., avg time: 5.315 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 5.162 ms., avg time: 5.383 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 5.277 ms., avg time: 5.456 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 5.560 ms., avg time: 5.757 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 5.853 ms., avg time: 6.035 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 6.266 ms., avg time: 6.474 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 6.056 ms., avg time: 6.247 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 6.083 ms., avg time: 6.260 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 6.549 ms., avg time: 6.698 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 20:07] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 7.509 ms., avg time: 7.652 ms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Sam"
Jun 2019
California, USA
3·13 Posts |
On my i7-5960X (Haswell-E) with DDR4-2133 CL13 4x8GB 2R memory, Prime95 v29.8 build 6:
Code:
Timings for 5120K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 3.80 ms. Throughput: 262.85 iter/sec. Timings for 5120K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 31.83, 31.70, 31.70, 31.67, 31.74, 31.87, 31.59, 31.71 ms. Throughput: 252.16 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 4.18 ms. Throughput: 239.16 iter/sec. Timings for 5376K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 34.27, 34.17, 33.99, 34.10, 34.02, 34.29, 34.19, 34.11 ms. Throughput: 234.31 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 4.67 ms. Throughput: 214.18 iter/sec. Timings for 5760K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 36.88, 36.72, 36.58, 36.75, 36.68, 36.97, 36.80, 36.87 ms. Throughput: 217.51 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 4.91 ms. Throughput: 203.74 iter/sec. Timings for 6144K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 39.03, 39.00, 38.89, 38.97, 39.04, 39.14, 39.08, 39.04 ms. Throughput: 205.00 iter/sec. Timings for 6400K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 5.18 ms. Throughput: 193.18 iter/sec. Timings for 6400K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 41.29, 41.37, 41.25, 41.35, 41.32, 41.40, 41.35, 41.28 ms. Throughput: 193.58 iter/sec. Timings for 6720K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 5.49 ms. Throughput: 182.04 iter/sec. Timings for 6720K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 43.62, 43.81, 43.23, 43.78, 43.66, 43.64, 43.80, 43.81 ms. Throughput: 183.20 iter/sec. Timings for 6912K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 5.59 ms. Throughput: 178.79 iter/sec. Timings for 6912K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 44.30, 44.06, 43.93, 44.34, 44.04, 44.26, 44.06, 44.73 ms. Throughput: 180.93 iter/sec. Timings for 7168K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 5.97 ms. Throughput: 167.62 iter/sec. Timings for 7168K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 47.03, 46.99, 47.24, 47.09, 47.09, 47.16, 46.85, 47.10 ms. Throughput: 169.96 iter/sec. Timings for 7680K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 5.99 ms. Throughput: 166.93 iter/sec. Timings for 7680K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 48.17, 48.36, 48.13, 48.53, 48.02, 48.39, 47.87, 48.24 ms. Throughput: 165.94 iter/sec. Timings for 8064K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 6.46 ms. Throughput: 154.72 iter/sec. Timings for 8064K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 51.94, 51.58, 51.47, 51.84, 51.75, 52.13, 51.53, 52.04 ms. Throughput: 154.49 iter/sec. Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cores, 1 worker): 7.47 ms. Throughput: 133.87 iter/sec. Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cores, 8 workers): 57.56, 57.16, 58.28, 57.59, 57.39, 57.98, 57.55, 57.66 ms. Throughput: 138.78 iter/sec. My i7-5960X system can do better as this X99 motherboard lacks memory overclocking support, so the quad channel DDR4 is stuck running at 2133. I'm looking into a replacement X99 motherboard to get the DDR4 running at 3000 or thereabouts, which hopefully can get the iteration time for 5120K FFT (8 core, 1 worker) down below 3ms. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
"Sam"
Jun 2019
California, USA
3×13 Posts |
@fivemack, what is the DDR4 memory configuration for your i9-7940X system?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
11001001101102 Posts |
Quote:
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/64gb...-16-18-18-35-x Now, if you want silly memory bandwidth, I have a Xeon Silver 4114 system. Much less AVX512 throughput (1x at 2500MHz versus 2x at 3700MHz), but 20 cores and 12 memory channels at 2400MHz Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 2.336 ms., avg time: 2.529 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 2.774 ms., avg time: 3.009 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 2.481 ms., avg time: 2.691 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 3.326 ms., avg time: 3.585 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 2.803 ms., avg time: 3.076 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 2.764 ms., avg time: 2.990 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 3.029 ms., avg time: 3.217 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 3.118 ms., avg time: 3.324 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 3.229 ms., avg time: 3.437 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 3.340 ms., avg time: 3.559 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 3.442 ms., avg time: 3.582 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 3.402 ms., avg time: 3.548 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 3.599 ms., avg time: 3.780 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 3.963 ms., avg time: 4.136 ms. Code:
[Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5120K FFT length. Best time: 4.159 ms., avg time: 4.293 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5184K FFT length. Best time: 4.444 ms., avg time: 4.586 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5376K FFT length. Best time: 4.437 ms., avg time: 4.568 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 5760K FFT length. Best time: 5.219 ms., avg time: 5.376 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6048K FFT length. Best time: 5.036 ms., avg time: 5.131 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6144K FFT length. Best time: 4.917 ms., avg time: 5.012 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6272K FFT length. Best time: 5.261 ms., avg time: 5.396 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6400K FFT length. Best time: 5.301 ms., avg time: 5.486 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 6720K FFT length. Best time: 5.606 ms., avg time: 5.764 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7056K FFT length. Best time: 6.007 ms., avg time: 6.122 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7168K FFT length. Best time: 5.915 ms., avg time: 6.016 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7200K FFT length. Best time: 5.966 ms., avg time: 6.039 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 7680K FFT length. Best time: 6.221 ms., avg time: 6.303 ms. [Worker #1 Nov 5 21:40] Timing 25 iterations of 8064K FFT length. Best time: 6.731 ms., avg time: 6.807 ms. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2019-11-05 at 21:44 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 48-core chip - Intel | hj47 | Hardware | 6 | 2009-12-20 13:59 |
| Intel Quad Core optimization | joblack | Hardware | 1 | 2009-06-11 02:42 |
| Optimising work for Intel Core 2 Duo or Quad Core | S485122 | Software | 0 | 2007-05-13 09:15 |
| Intel's 80 core beast... | TehPenguin | Hardware | 10 | 2006-11-27 11:13 |
| Intel Core Duo processor | drew | Hardware | 5 | 2006-05-29 07:00 |