![]() |
|
|
#4335 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
![]() If done properly, there should be no "got-arounds" (at least, not without a LOT more work than most people are willing to do). Frankly, my understanding is very often these large stagnating batch reservations are usually because of SPEs during spider creation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4336 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
230478 Posts |
So, I spent a bit of time bringing in the candidates to TF appropriately, now that we're back to a somewhat sane state wrt the reservations.
I realized that we are actually under a bit of crunch. But, somewhat ironically, in P-1'ing. Primenet is currently assigning work in 94.5M for "Cat 4" assignments. We're good there for the moment -- a couple of thousand or so candidates already optionally TF'ed and P-1'ed. However, this will move into 95M within a couple of weeks or so. We don't have as much of a buffer there -- currently only about 800 candidates. So, my question... Would the GPU72 P-1'ers mind being given work in 95M to do, instead of 92M? It will take longer per run, but each assignment will be appropriately TF'ed to 77 before assignment for P-1'ing. And once completed they can immediately be released back to Priment to give to "unproven" GIMPS participants (read: the Cat 4 "Churners"). Thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4337 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
965410 Posts |
Then why are you handling out 34M to 73 for my collab work?
Start immediately to handle out 97M to 77 bits or so (I have seen you handle those out if I type a wrong key, so the anonymous users get 97M already - I did some of them by mistake and reported the results by hand, as the spider didn't get the wrong key right (pun intended)). Also, should I move my ~10THzD/D worth of cards to LL front requests? Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-10-29 at 06:40 Reason: spacing... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4338 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Because that's what you asked for when you set up the AKey...
![]() I had hoped to get it finished yesterday, but you will soon be able to change the WorkType for each AKEY. I've got meetings with representitives from Estonia all day today, but will try to get this finished tonight. Yes please!!! LG72D would be ideal! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4339 | |
|
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
11·311 Posts |
Quote:
I'd been working on "other" P-1 work (re-doing badly done P-1) but I've thrown that back and my two P-1 systems will chew on whatever GPU72 sends my way (at least for the next few months). Last fiddled with by James Heinrich on 2019-10-29 at 13:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4340 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
231328 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4341 |
|
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
3×491 Posts |
@chalsall:
I´ve been consistently getting DC TF work (using The GPU72 Trial Factoring Colaboratory Notebook), although the Akey I´m using is supposed to correspond to LL TF work type. Also, just so you know, there are two assignments I finished 3 weeks ago and reported to the Primenet server, that still appear (100% done and with no "days to go") in my assignment list. You may wish to have a look at it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4342 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
2×3×1,609 Posts |
Quote:
![]() (one of my wildest dreams is to play him face to face and beat him, the first will probably never happen, and for the second there is no hope, I played him on his renjuclass many years ago and he beat me so hard, like 12 to 0 or so, haha). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4343 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
100110001001112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4344 | ||
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
9,767 Posts |
Quote:
1. Any assignments which are given to one of your "Instances" is yours until completion. 2. Thus, for example, if you run an AKey asking for DCTF, but then later switch to one asking for LLTF, the outstanding DCTF work is still assigned out first. This /might/ explain what you're reporting. But... perhaps not... Could you please PM me the "Name" of the AKey in question? Quote:
This last week has been a bit, shall we say, scattered... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4345 | |
|
Random Account
Aug 2009
22×3×163 Posts |
Quote:
A spider. That's as good a name as any. As long as they can be stopped... A note about P-1's. I did a test earlier today. I ran a single P-1, from 92M, with Prime95 to get a sense of the time. 6.5 hours, it took using two cores as workers. I am repeating now with CUDAPm1. I found an updated binary on James' site. The older one would not run, period. It estimated 2 hours for stage 1. Stage 2, I don't know yet. Still, it should finish in less time than Prime95. Anyone grabbing, or trying to grab, a lot of these, should keep the time required to run them in mind. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Status | Primeinator | Operation Billion Digits | 5 | 2011-12-06 02:35 |
| 62 bit status | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 27 | 2008-09-29 13:52 |
| OBD Status | Uncwilly | Operation Billion Digits | 22 | 2005-10-25 14:05 |
| 1-2M LLR status | paulunderwood | 3*2^n-1 Search | 2 | 2005-03-13 17:03 |
| Status of 26.0M - 26.5M | 1997rj7 | Lone Mersenne Hunters | 25 | 2004-06-18 16:46 |