![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
571 Posts |
What I was TRYING to do was add my results to the perpetual benchmark thread and the hardware benchmark thread for 100M exponents. I guess I did it wrong because this benchmark is producing about 4 lines per minute for the last 1.5 hours ... Should I let this benchmark run and then do the other benchmark? How do I do the other benchmark? Should I submit these results somewhere?
Last fiddled with by JuanTutors on 2019-07-31 at 21:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·2,767 Posts |
Depending on the setting you chose for bench marking it can run quite a while.
What did you choose? You can kill it, if you desire, it won't hurt anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
57110 Posts |
I chose throughput benchmark minimum and maximum fft default 2048 and 8192, 8 cores, checked benchmark hyperthreading, workers 1, 15 seconds, and checked off benchmark all fft implementations to find the best one for your machine. It's on 3072K right now. I don't care about the time if it'll HELP, either me or the rest of you. If not, I'd rather just kill it and do the right benchmark for the perpetual benchmark thread and for the 100M benchmark thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
"Juan Tutors"
Mar 2004
10001110112 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 29.2 benchmark help | Prime95 | Software | 69 | 2017-05-23 23:49 |
| 29.2 benchmark help #2 (Ryzen only) | Prime95 | Software | 10 | 2017-05-08 13:24 |
| Benchmark Variances | Fred | Software | 5 | 2016-04-01 18:15 |
| Does anyone have i7 920? for Benchmark? | cipher | Twin Prime Search | 2 | 2009-04-14 20:16 |
| Benchmark Weirdness | R.D. Silverman | Hardware | 2 | 2007-07-25 12:16 |