![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
pg(k) is the number (2^k-1)*10^d+2^(k-1)-1 where d is the number of decimal digits of 2^(k-1)-1
pg(215) and pg(541456) are probable primes. 215 and 541456 are multiples of 43 and 10 mod 41. 541456 is 215 mod 307. I conjecture that when k is multiple of 43 and pg(k) is prime and pg(k) is 10 mod 41, then k is 215 mod 307. for k of the form 1763s+215 and pg(k) prime, k is 215 mod 307 Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2019-07-31 at 07:20 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Kebbaj Reda"
May 2018
Casablanca, Morocco
89 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Mar 2018
10000100102 Posts |
yes...my english is awful...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
258B16 Posts |
Let \(C_0 = 2\), \(C_i = 2^{C_{i-1}}-1\).
So: C1 = M2 = 22-1 = 3, prime C2 = MM2 = M3 = 2M2-1 = 23-1 = 7, prime C3 = MMM2 = MM3 = M7 = (some nerdy formulas in a row) = 127, prime C4 = MMMM2 = MMM3 = MM7 = M127=(more nerdy formulas) = 170141183460469231731687303715884105727, prime C5 = MMMMM2 = MMMM3 = MMM7 = MM127 = crazzy large number with trillions of trillions of digits (do you think I counted them? )Catalan conjecture (we don't know the answer, but most people believe it is false): C5 is prime. Let: C6 = MMMMMM2 = MMMMM3 = MMMM7 = MMM127 = MMcrazzylargenumberwithtrillionsoftrillionsofdigits LaurV's QUANTUM conjecture (most probably false, but I will post it anyhow, to show to all the guys here how clever I am, and better add something about quantum age because every mention to quantum stuff attract people like every mention to shit attracts flies, and if possible, write it with UPPERCASE to show everybody I don't give a prime about their feelings): C6 is prime. See you disprove this, quantum or not... Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2019-07-31 at 08:48 Reason: changed to mathjax, as it seems the [sub] doesn't work inside [sup] |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
if pg(k) is prime and k is of the form 1763s+215, then k is 215 mod 307...or I don't know if this is equivalent
when pg(k) is prime and k is of the form 1763s+215, then 10k is congruent to 1 (mod 307) Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2019-07-31 at 10:40 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quantum something or other | aurashift | Science & Technology | 12 | 2018-11-02 22:38 |
| A wrong track to demonstrate that the Catalan's conjecture is false | garambois | Aliquot Sequences | 12 | 2015-10-21 10:24 |
| Disproven Primality Test for Specific Class of kb^n-1 | primus | Computer Science & Computational Number Theory | 8 | 2014-08-21 15:16 |
| Quantum Computer | mathemajikian | Hardware | 24 | 2009-02-03 04:38 |
| Cows,sheep and a lamb! | mfgoode | Puzzles | 32 | 2007-07-29 07:49 |