![]() |
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Jan 2019
Tallahassee, FL
3638 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...3898333&full=1 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
124528 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-07-27 at 20:47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
1100010101102 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Jan 2019
Tallahassee, FL
35 Posts |
Quote:
After I'm done I'll submit the result and wait for mersenne.ca to update the p-1 bounds to run p1 lucas. Probably gonna take like 3-4 months for the prime test if no factors are found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·32·7·43 Posts |
No need to wait. The proper bounds are determined by the client software based on the worktodo entry, in prime95/mprime or CUDAPm1; they don't do any lookup of P-1 bounds on any server. (But if you were running P-1 in GpuOwL, you'd need to look at the bounds on mersenne.ca, or have a guide for what to pick. GpuOwl's default bounds I would not rely on.)
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-07-28 at 07:07 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2·32·7·43 Posts |
Maybe he doesn't need to, IF the exponent he enters is available. But it's a way to confirm the exponent is indeed AVAILABLE for assignment. The proof is in actually obtaining an assignment. Anyone running CUDALucas must obtain assignments manually, because there's no primenet interface, and no maintained reserve/submit auxiliary program. FYI, dcheuk also runs gpus on GIMPS tasks.
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-07-28 at 07:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Mar 2004
22×33×5 Posts |
I did get more confused :-) So, I have WorkPreference=153. I set number of days to 90. I got assigned a 100M digit mersenne in the M332000000 range. Is there anything I need to do now? Thanks for the help! It's been a LOONG TIME since I've been back. We weren't even doing PRP tests back then. I think it was in the v25.4 era.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
2×32×7×43 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-07-29 at 00:52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Mar 2004
22×33×5 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Jan 2019
Tallahassee, FL
24310 Posts |
Quote:
So I ran cudapm1 with this line (in worktodo.txt): Code:
PFactor=1,2,333898333,-1,81,2 Code:
Using up to 6560M GPU memory. Selected B1=3130000, B2=71207500, 3.82% chance of finding a factor Using B1 = 3130000 from savefile. Continuing stage 2 from a partial result of M333898333 fft length = 20480K Starting stage 2. Using b1 = 3130000, b2 = 71207500, d = 2310, e = 12, nrp = 21 (program auto exists after this line ...) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2×1,579 Posts |
Quote:
If you want I can trial factor it a bit on the GPU, you can PM me the exponent, it is up to you. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 332.2M - 333.9M (aka 100M digit range) | Uncwilly | LMH > 100M | 684 | 2018-07-01 10:52 |
| I want a 100M digit Mersenne that.... | JuanTutors | PrimeNet | 8 | 2012-12-06 13:47 |
| 100M-digit n/k pairs | __HRB__ | Riesel Prime Search | 0 | 2010-05-22 01:17 |
| Who is LL-ing a mersenne number > 100M digits? | joblack | LMH > 100M | 1 | 2009-10-08 12:31 |
| 62-digit prime factor of a Mersenne number | ET_ | Factoring | 39 | 2006-05-11 18:27 |