mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > enzocreti

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-05-01, 12:22   #1
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

2×5×53 Posts
Default primes of the form 10^k*5080978447+1

k=1
is prime
k=29 is prime

any other prime of the form 10^k*5080978447+1?
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-05-01, 13:00   #2
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

22×3×421 Posts
Default

1
9
10
19
29
49
476
2009
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-05-01, 19:19   #3
lukerichards
 
lukerichards's Avatar
 
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK

25×32 Posts
Default

As an aside I would write this as 5080978447*10^k+1. When I first read it I thought you were multiplying the exponent by the big number!
lukerichards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-05-02, 14:16   #4
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

122316 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lukerichards View Post
As an aside I would write this as 5080978447*10^k+1. When I first read it I thought you were multiplying the exponent by the big number!
It took me a moment to decipher the rendition in the OP also.

It did give me an excuse to see how sieving speeds things up in an actual example. I first ran a totally mindless script verifying the exponents giving (pseudo)primes up to the limit 3000. (Previously-stated results confirmed.)

Then, I determined the possible prime factors p of n = 5080978447*10^k + 1 and looked at the number of n's not divisible by any of these p, up to a modest limit. The number of candidates dropped as the limit on p was raised. Each candidate excluded by having a small factor, is a humungous number not being subjected to a pseudoprime test. Sieving out candidates divisible by small primes sped things up considerably!

I leave it as an exercise to give a condition on p, 5 < p < 5080978447, that determines whether p divides 5080978447*10^k + 1 for some positive integer k. Note that 2, 3, and 5 are automatically excluded as factors of 5080978447*10^k + 1.

If I did my sums right, the values of p < 200 are [7, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 43, 47, 59, 61, 71, 79, 83, 89, 97, 107, 109, 113, 131, 149, 151, 163, 167, 179, 181, 191, 193].

Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 2019-05-02 at 14:16 Reason: rephrasing
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Primes of the form (b+-1)*b^n+-1 and b^n+-(b+-1) sweety439 sweety439 162 2020-05-15 18:33
Primes of the Form Mod(p,q) = Mod(x,q) a1call Miscellaneous Math 6 2018-12-11 03:34
Primes of the form n+-phi(n) carpetpool carpetpool 3 2017-01-26 01:29
Primes of the form a^(2^n)+b^(2^n) YuL Math 21 2012-10-23 11:06
Primes of the form 2.3^n+1 Dougy Math 8 2009-09-03 02:44

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:44.


Sat Jul 17 04:44:55 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 2:32, 1 user, load averages: 2.63, 2.27, 2.21

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.