![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"Mike"
Aug 2002
25·257 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3×1,171 Posts |
Easy to find solutions. I wonder what "elegant" looks like for this puzzle; mine surely are not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3·1,171 Posts |
Found a solution for 4x4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
205510 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3·1,171 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3·5·137 Posts |
Well shouldn't spoil the challenge at this point but there is a simple algorithm as a factor of number of rows as is obvious with the great number of solutions submitted this early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
1001000002 Posts |
Thanks for sharing. My year 10 class (aged 14-15) had great fun with this today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
22·7·167 Posts |
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3×5×137 Posts |
Well, I did a 101x101 matrix because I found it interesting to write a code to generate a code to solve the large matrix. Otherwise it would have been prohibitively too much work to type the code to check all the 101+101+2 averages.
![]() ETA Again, I wished someone would write a "foreach" style function for the PARI-GP vectors/matrices or add a few decent numeric examples to the forvec loop documentation. Last fiddled with by a1call on 2019-04-07 at 20:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
100101100010112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
"Ben"
Feb 2007
3·1,171 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| January 2019 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 74 | 2019-04-09 13:34 |
| March 2019 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 6 | 2019-04-04 16:32 |
| February 2019 | Xyzzy | Puzzles | 17 | 2019-03-07 21:05 |
| 2019 Coding Challenge | miroslavkures | Number Theory Discussion Group | 2 | 2018-12-27 08:59 |