mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Linux

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-03-22, 17:28   #23
ssybesma
 
"Steve Sybesma"
May 2012
Brighton, CO USA

1218 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Before you get to deep into testing, do Advanced/Time on your 332xxxxxx exponent for 100 iterations. That will give you an estimate of how long this will primality test will take. I fear an Atom processor will take more than a decade.

Should you decide to continue *please* do a PRP test, not an LL test.

Gosh I hope that's not right, but I'll go ahead and do what you said.

I may have to stick to the smaller primes with these Intel Compute Sticks.
ssybesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-03-22, 18:06   #24
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

37×263 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssybesma View Post
Gosh I hope that's not right, but I'll go ahead and do what you said. I may have to stick to the smaller primes with these Intel Compute Sticks.
It might be reasonable to presume that the author of the code you're running would understand its characteristics....
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-03-22, 20:20   #25
nomead
 
nomead's Avatar
 
"Sam Laur"
Dec 2018
Turku, Finland

4768 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssybesma View Post
Gosh I hope that's not right, but I'll go ahead and do what you said.

I may have to stick to the smaller primes with these Intel Compute Sticks.
Based on the information in the earlier thread, it's a 4-core 4-thread Atom. As a reference, my D2550 (2-core 4-thread) Atom takes 2.6 seconds per iteration, using both cores for the single worker, at the 18M fft size used on those 332xxxxxx-class exponents. I'd expect yours to be about double as fast. So that would be roughly 13.7 years to complete just one primality test. Do you feel lucky?
nomead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-03-23, 04:44   #26
ssybesma
 
"Steve Sybesma"
May 2012
Brighton, CO USA

1218 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomead View Post
Based on the information in the earlier thread, it's a 4-core 4-thread Atom. As a reference, my D2550 (2-core 4-thread) Atom takes 2.6 seconds per iteration, using both cores for the single worker, at the 18M fft size used on those 332xxxxxx-class exponents. I'd expect yours to be about double as fast. So that would be roughly 13.7 years to complete just one primality test. Do you feel lucky?

I believe I told Prime95 I would follow his instruction.

Last fiddled with by ssybesma on 2019-03-23 at 04:48
ssybesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-11, 04:32   #27
ssybesma
 
"Steve Sybesma"
May 2012
Brighton, CO USA

5116 Posts
Default question on 60-day extensions being wiped out

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
Before you get to deep into testing, do Advanced/Time on your 332xxxxxx exponent for 100 iterations. That will give you an estimate of how long this will primality test will take. I fear an Atom processor will take more than a decade.

Should you decide to continue *please* do a PRP test, not an LL test.



Hello Prime95,

I took your advice and am restricting the Intel Compute Stick to the lowest available exponents and as a
result it's going to take a small fraction of the time of the 332xxxxxx exponent I was initially going to test.

It just completed 2% after three days and some of that time I had it down for other stuff I was doing with it.

I would like to know how to keep the 60 day extensions from resetting to zero.
Is there a file I can edit that will prevent the extensions from being wiped out?
Or do I have to keep manually extending?


Thanks!

Last fiddled with by ssybesma on 2019-04-11 at 04:34
ssybesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Running octoproth program in Linux jasong Octoproth Search 9 2007-12-27 02:44
running linux version Unregistered Information & Answers 1 2007-09-08 17:59
Linux - what version to use, where doI get it rx7350 Software 19 2006-03-17 08:18
running old version of mprime for speed? talcum Software 4 2005-03-03 15:24
monitoring a Linux version Carlo Monari Software 4 2004-12-11 17:26

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:34.


Sat Jul 17 08:34:59 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 6:22, 1 user, load averages: 1.34, 1.44, 1.48

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.