mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet > GPU to 72

Reply
Thread Tools
Old 2019-01-01, 02:24   #4236
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James Heinrich View Post
Hey, I just spent 6 months doing CPU-TF!
Of course, that was because no GPU software supports >232 exponents...
LOL...

Whatever rocks your boat!
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-01, 05:43   #4237
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502
 
Uncwilly's Avatar
 
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

981810 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
Dude! You're still using a CPU to TF? Are you stoned, man?
My kit, my joy. Actually some of the machines that I am using I don't want to discover a prime on. TF ensures that. And on my laptop, it keeps the fan quiet and the machine cool. SDC and TC reduce the risk of finding a prime low enough that I am willing to risk it on those other machines.
Uncwilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-01, 13:35   #4238
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

262716 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncwilly View Post
My kit, my joy.
Absolutely. Sorry, should have put a or a on my post....
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-01, 14:27   #4239
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

152B16 Posts
Default Scattered full TF depth

Please consider running scattered islands of exponents up to or toward the full GPUto72 individual goal bit levels. You could call it something like QAislands.
Something like for any million range in exponent, the first thousand range of exponents.
For example, for the range 171 million to 172 million, take each prime exponent between 171000000 to 171001000 to the lesser of 78 bits or whatever finds a factor.

Users like mikr and rudimeier have already done some of this. It is very useful when prequalifying a few exponents for P-1 software testing on high exponents on gpu by finishing them myself to gputo72 factoring goal levels. Thank you to the pioneers who have already done some of this, to or near primenet goal bit levels several years ago, for example.
(Also, some of the computerids are entertaining. Bonnie, clyde, bart, homer, ...)

The higher ones will represent a very considerable amount of total work per exponent.
https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/101000117 114GhzD to go to gputo72 level (76)
https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/171000043 346GhzD to go to gputo72 level (78)
https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/371000039 1.2ThzD to go to gputo72 level (81)
https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/919000001 8.4ThzD to go to gputo72 level (85)
https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/999999043 13.7 ThzD to go to gputo72 level (86)

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-01-01 at 14:32
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-01, 15:59   #4240
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kriesel View Post
Please consider running scattered islands of exponents up to or toward the full GPUto72 individual goal bit levels. You could call it something like QAislands.
I understand the rationale for doing this kind of thing, but I'd prefer that GPU72 (mostly) focuses on the Primenet wave-fronts.

What I'd suggest you do is solicit assistance from forum participants by way of a thread or sub-forum. Similar to what Aaron does with Strategic Double Checks and Triple Checks.

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2019-01-02 at 01:00 Reason: s/rational/rationale/; # As a dyslexic, I /always/ get that word wrong....
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-01, 17:12   #4241
kriesel
 
kriesel's Avatar
 
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

5,419 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
I'd prefer that GPU72 (mostly) focuses on the Primenet wave-fronts.
I agree. Emphatically. Keeping a substantial stock of adequately TFed exponents in front of the cpu wave is a top priority.
kriesel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-07, 21:39   #4242
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

262716 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
We're about two weeks away from taking everything below 97M to at least 72 "bits". ... So, once everything "owned" by GPU72 at 71 is assigned, the system will start giving out work to 73 bits (starting in 92M), even if the pledge is only to 72.
OK, this was a little faster than expected, but GPU72 is now "out of" candidates to take to 72.

From now on, all automated requests (MISFIT, mloop et al) will automatically bump the pledge level up to 73.

For those who use the manual assignment page at GPU72, if they choose a pledge of 72 it will show "Sorry... No assignments available which match your criteria." in the preview. If they still click "Get Assignments" they will be assigned work to 73 bits (currently in 92M).

I'll monitor the logs for the next couple of hours, to make sure I haven't made a SPE. But, as always, please let me know if anyone sees anything strange....
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-07, 21:47   #4243
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

22·3·17·23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
OK, this was a little faster than expected, but GPU72 is now "out of" candidates to take to 72.

From now on, all automated requests (MISFIT, mloop et al) will automatically bump the pledge level up to 73.

For those who use the manual assignment page at GPU72, if they choose a pledge of 72 it will show "Sorry... No assignments available which match your criteria." in the preview. If they still click "Get Assignments" they will be assigned work to 73 bits (currently in 92M).

I'll monitor the logs for the next couple of hours, to make sure I haven't made a SPE. But, as always, please let me know if anyone sees anything strange....
Just curious: why stop at 97M....vs for example 100M ?
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-07, 21:54   #4244
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

2·5·293 Posts
Default

Might be worth it to go up to <101M.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-07, 22:25   #4245
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

9,767 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
Might be worth it to go up to <101M.
As explained above, some are working "off the books" in 97M and above, and I always get yelled at (wink) when GPU72 assigns work which is then completed by someone else....
chalsall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-01-09, 04:09   #4246
LaurV
Romulan Interpreter
 
LaurV's Avatar
 
Jun 2011
Thailand

2×3×1,609 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chalsall View Post
As explained above, some are working "off the books" in 97M and above, and I always get yelled at (wink) when GPU72 assigns work which is then completed by someone else....
This will always be the case, no matter what you do, somebody will yell at you. Ask those who complain to raise their pledge, to avoid "of the book" work (mainly done by people who are after fast factors, so easy tasks, low bitlevels).
LaurV is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Status Primeinator Operation Billion Digits 5 2011-12-06 02:35
62 bit status 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 27 2008-09-29 13:52
OBD Status Uncwilly Operation Billion Digits 22 2005-10-25 14:05
1-2M LLR status paulunderwood 3*2^n-1 Search 2 2005-03-13 17:03
Status of 26.0M - 26.5M 1997rj7 Lone Mersenne Hunters 25 2004-06-18 16:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:32.


Mon Aug 2 09:32:27 UTC 2021 up 10 days, 4:01, 0 users, load averages: 1.35, 1.28, 1.34

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.