![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
31·173 Posts |
For s0=4, is M50 + or - in the p-3 iteration? (Tiebreaker...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
35×13 Posts |
It is a +. I only posted it back in the M50 discussion thread and forgot to update this one:
Code:
S[0]=4 S[0]=10 S[0]=2/3 M2: p=3 + - - M3: p=5 + - - M4: p=7 - - - M5: p=13 + + + M6: p=17 - + + M7: p=19 - + - M8: p=31 + + - M9: p=61 + + + M10: p=89 - + + M11: p=107 - + - M12: p=127 + + - M13: p=521 - + + M14: p=607 - - - M15: p=1279 - - - M16: p=2203 + - - M17: p=2281 - + + M18: p=3217 - + + M19: p=4253 + + + M20: p=4423 - - - M21: p=9689 - + + M22: p=9941 + + + M23: p=11213 - - + M24: p=19937 + - + M25: p=21701 - - + M26: p=23209 + - + M27: p=44497 - + + M28: p=86243 + - - M29: p=110503 + + - M30: p=132049 + - + M31: p=216091 - + - M32: p=756839 + + - M33: p=859433 - + + M34: p=1257787 - + - M35: p=1398269 + + + M36: p=2976221 + + + M37: p=3021377 + - + M38: p=6972593 + - + M39: p=13466917 + + + M40: p=20996011 + - - M41: p=24036583 - - - M42: p=25964951 + + - M43: p=30402457 - + + M44: p=32582657 - + + M45: p=37156667 + - - M46: p=42643801 - + + M47: p=43112609 + - + M48: p=57885161 - + + M49: p=74207281 - + + M50: p=77232917 + + + 25+ 30+ 29+ 24- 19- 20- ----------------------------- 49 49 49 Last fiddled with by ATH on 2018-08-06 at 13:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
31×173 Posts |
Quote:
Note http://www.hoegge.dk/mersenne/penult...esultsS0=4.txt does not include M50 yet. Attached is a chart of the ratio of +/- versus maximum Mp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
35·13 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by ATH on 2018-08-06 at 16:48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest
123638 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
35·13 Posts |
The penultimate iteration is a minus this time for S0=4 and S0=10 and a plus for S0=2/3, which leads to a very symmetrical result: 25/25, 30/20, 30/20
Code:
S[0]=4 S[0]=10 S[0]=2/3 M2: p=3 + - - M3: p=5 + - - M4: p=7 - - - M5: p=13 + + + M6: p=17 - + + M7: p=19 - + - M8: p=31 + + - M9: p=61 + + + M10: p=89 - + + M11: p=107 - + - M12: p=127 + + - M13: p=521 - + + M14: p=607 - - - M15: p=1279 - - - M16: p=2203 + - - M17: p=2281 - + + M18: p=3217 - + + M19: p=4253 + + + M20: p=4423 - - - M21: p=9689 - + + M22: p=9941 + + + M23: p=11213 - - + M24: p=19937 + - + M25: p=21701 - - + M26: p=23209 + - + M27: p=44497 - + + M28: p=86243 + - - M29: p=110503 + + - M30: p=132049 + - + M31: p=216091 - + - M32: p=756839 + + - M33: p=859433 - + + M34: p=1257787 - + - M35: p=1398269 + + + M36: p=2976221 + + + M37: p=3021377 + - + M38: p=6972593 + - + M39: p=13466917 + + + M40: p=20996011 + - - M41: p=24036583 - - - M42: p=25964951 + + - M43: p=30402457 - + + M44: p=32582657 - + + M45: p=37156667 + - - M46: p=42643801 - + + M47: p=43112609 + - + M48: p=57885161 - + + M49: p=74207281 - + + M50: p=77232917 + + + M51: p=82589933 - - + 25+ 30+ 30+ 25- 20- 20- ----------------------------- 50 50 50 Last fiddled with by ATH on 2018-12-22 at 06:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36×13 Posts |
Well, we know e(2/3) = 1 because p51 = 1 (mod 4), as announced by George.
And now we know that the p51 = 5 (mod 8) - because see post #31 |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Dec 2003
16410 Posts |
I think the table deserves to be included in the Mersenne Prime Wikipedia article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Sep 2003
5·11·47 Posts |
Quote:
However, there is a separate Lucas-Lehmer primality test article, where it would fit well. That article would also need a discussion of alternate starting values s0. I read once that there is actually a range of possibilities other than 4, 10, and 2/3. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2018-12-15 at 11:37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville
26×131 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | ||
|
Sep 2003
5·11·47 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lucas-lehmer theorem | Robot2357 | Math | 6 | 2013-06-15 03:10 |
| Can zero be an "intermediate step" value in Lucas-Lehmer? | That Don Guy | Math | 10 | 2012-02-03 18:02 |
| lucas lehmer outstretch | science_man_88 | Miscellaneous Math | 7 | 2010-07-14 12:35 |
| Lucas-Lehmer Test | storm5510 | Math | 22 | 2009-09-24 22:32 |
| Lucas-Lehmer | Dougal | Information & Answers | 9 | 2009-02-06 10:25 |