![]() |
|
|
#34 |
|
Mar 2018
2×5×53 Posts |
No this is not unusual i agree...
anyway the multiples of 215 and 36, that are unusual |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Aug 2006
10111010110112 Posts |
OK. But order is important, you found the numbers first, then discovered that there were multiples of those numbers -- you didn't say that you expected to find multiples of 215 and 36, and then start calculating. So we shouldn't look at the chance that you'd find three multiples of 215 and two multiples of 36, but rather some number of multiples around that size. Can you think of a good model to check, and then decide what the odds are for that model? That way we can see if what happened here is, in fact, unusual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Mar 2018
53010 Posts |
Quote:
NO I cant I am not Andrew Wiles!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Aug 2006
175B16 Posts |
Let's start with something more basic. Given a random integer*, what is the probability that it is divisible by 36? Given 37 random integers, what is the probability that at least 2 are divisible by 36?
* There is a technical problem here -- there is no uniform distribution over the integers -- but it can be avoided so I'll just handwave for now. Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2018-12-14 at 07:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
I don't know, I think anyway it is a low chance and even lower ,given 37 random numbers, the chance three numbers are divisible by 215
Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2018-12-14 at 09:39 |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Mar 2018
2×5×53 Posts |
moreover:
pg(215) is prime pg(215*428) is prime pg(215*324) is prime. 428 and 324 are both congruent to -1 mod 13. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Mar 2018
2×5×53 Posts |
Moreover:
215 is congruent to 111 mod 13 215*428 is congruent to -111 mod 13 215*324 is congruent to -111 mod 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
Moreover:
215 is congruent to -(2^3-1) mod 111 215*324 is congruent to (2^6-1) mod 111 215*428 is congruent to (2^1-1) mod 111 |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Mar 2018
53010 Posts |
I don't know if this is redundant:
215 is congruent to 7 mod 13 (215*324) is congruent to - 7 mod 13 (215*428) is congruent to -7 mod 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Mar 2018
10228 Posts |
If all these are coincidences, I am superman!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Mar 2018
2·5·53 Posts |
if you extend to the pg(43k)
in the case pg(541456) is prime and 541456 is congruent to -111 mod 13 Last fiddled with by enzocreti on 2018-12-14 at 12:55 |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Unique Groupings found in the first 49 mersenne numbers | ONeil | ONeil | 27 | 2018-12-03 01:52 |
| I think I found proof that no odd perfect numbers exist! | Philly314 | Aliquot Sequences | 3 | 2014-11-16 14:58 |
| Have Found Principle to generate infinitive PRIME NUMBERS | Evgeny Dolgov | Miscellaneous Math | 38 | 2010-09-05 17:45 |
| Can You See The Patterns..? | wustvn | Puzzles | 7 | 2008-11-20 14:00 |
| Shortest sequence of numbers not found in M43 | Xyzzy | Miscellaneous Math | 41 | 2008-11-08 17:57 |