mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > enzocreti

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-12-03, 10:02   #1
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

10228 Posts
Default Program for Sage

pg(k) numbers are so defined:


pg(k)=(2^k-1)*10^d+2^(k-1)-1 where d is the number of decimal digits of 2^(k-1)-1.
The numbers are formed by the concatenation base 10 of two consecutive Mersenne numbers, examples are 157, 40952047.
I conjectured that there is no prime of this form congruent to 6 modulo 7.
has somebody an efficient routine for Sage for testing this conjecture?
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 10:28   #2
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

22×3×421 Posts
Default

Thread moved to blog area
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 15:33   #3
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

36×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enzocreti View Post
I conjectured that there is no prime of this form congruent to 6 modulo 7.
It has been explained to you in other threads that this 'conjecture' is almost obviously false.
It is similar to a 'conjecture' that there are no 2-million-digit numbers, because 'I cannot imagine them and I cannot test them. Will someone test them for me?'. That's not a conjecture - that's a limitation of means.
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 18:45   #4
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

2·5·53 Posts
Default Probable primes 5 and 6 mod 7

I found 9 probable primes with residue 5 mod 7 and none with residue 6 mod 7 (residue 5 and 6 occur with the same frequency). That cannot be coincidence!
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 18:51   #5
chalsall
If I May
 
chalsall's Avatar
 
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados

37·263 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enzocreti View Post
That cannot be coincidence!
Correlation != Causality.
chalsall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 18:57   #6
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enzocreti View Post
I found 9 probable primes with residue 5 mod 7 and none with residue 6 mod 7 (residue 5 and 6 occur with the same frequency). That cannot be coincidence!
primes other than 7 can be 1,2,3,4,5,6 mod 7 the odds in theory of a prime not being 6 mod 7 given equal probability ( a potentially invalid assumption) is 5/6 so the odds that 5 primes aren't 6 mod 7 is (5/6)^5 = (5^5)/(6^5) = 3125/7776 ~40% still not that bad. 5 mod 7 are also 19 mod 42, 6 mod 7 are all 13 mod 42. even with 9 it is still roughly 20%

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-12-03 at 19:00
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 19:04   #7
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

2·5·53 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
primes other than 7 can be 1,2,3,4,5,6 mod 7 the odds in theory of a prime not being 6 mod 7 given equal probability ( a potentially invalid assumption) is 5/6 so the odds that 5 primes aren't 6 mod 7 is (5/6)^5 = (5^5)/(6^5) = 3125/7776 ~40% still not that bad. 5 mod 7 are also 19 mod 42, 6 mod 7 are all 13 mod 42. even with 9 it is still roughly 20%
ok and what about the "coincidence" of an exponent leading to a prime which is 51456 and another exponent leading to a prime which is 541456...where 541456-51456=700^2. These numbers have an hidden structure!
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 19:10   #8
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

10228 Posts
Default

Another "coincidence": an exponent leading to a prime is 2131, another is 19179=2131*9, to me seems quite clear that these numbers have some hidden structure...it is too difficult for me to say what is this hidden structure but it MUST exist!
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 19:16   #9
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

2×5×53 Posts
Default primes

Maybe a specialist in Number theory knows something about these primes...i repeat look at the exponents...215,92020,69660...all multiples of 215...it is too hard anyway for me to find a pattern
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 19:20   #10
enzocreti
 
Mar 2018

10228 Posts
Default 255127

One of these primes 255127 divides 2^258+3.
enzocreti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-12-03, 19:24   #11
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

203008 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enzocreti View Post
Maybe a specialist in Number theory knows something about these primes...i repeat look at the exponents...215,92020,69660...all multiples of 215...it is too hard anyway for me to find a pattern
you can use the form in a possible proof of the claim ... : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

Last fiddled with by science_man_88 on 2018-12-03 at 19:24
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GPU LLR program jasong GPU Computing 19 2011-08-23 03:32
about the program boooh Information & Answers 2 2010-03-22 15:22
Program Primeinator Information & Answers 5 2009-07-16 21:42
program P-1 for K*2^n-1 jocelynl 15k Search 19 2004-01-11 17:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:29.


Sat Jul 17 04:29:22 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 2:16, 1 user, load averages: 2.03, 2.21, 2.29

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.