![]() |
|
|
#12 | |
|
Aug 2018
2·3 Posts |
Quote:
For additional core allocation, I'd use a check box to enable and number of cores (to use) with start/end time. By trade I'm a software engineer and familiar with wxWidgets and I'd be willing to offer time to do a new interface or selected UI changes if that is what is desired. I'd just need assistance navigating the code to begin with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2·1,579 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
72·197 Posts |
This is not to complain, we are quite happy with how P95 handles the stuff, and always find the way around the issues. And we don't very much like OP's tone of "I want to help you but you don't let me". You either want to help, or not... Either way, we are ok.
But.... Many recent (and not so recent) programs run at idle priority too... (one example is Acrobat reader, quite used in technical circles, and discussed here many times, and no, we can not change to foxit reader or else, as the "else" can not handle 3Dpdf formats). And they will slow to half speed when sharing resources with P95 (there is a discussion here somewhere around). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2018-08-10 at 07:46 Reason: spacing... we still couldn't solve this "additional cr/lf" forum issue |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Feb 2016
UK
3×5×29 Posts |
There is one scenario where having background tasks, even at idle priority, can have a significant (user noticeable) impact. That is on CPUs which have hyper-threading or SMT enabled. This will reduce the remaining resource available on the other thread of the core. The only workaround I know of for this is to disable HT/SMT, assuming it isn't otherwise needed. Then the higher priority process is able to make better use of the cores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
293010 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Sep 2018
3×23 Posts |
Quote:
Yeah I run it on my gaming machine and I haven't noticed any issues at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
72×197 Posts |
Quote:
On the other point, gaming is by definition something that does not go "idle priority". My Starcraft 2 also does not slow down if P95 runs (but cudaLucas slows to 40% of the initial speed when I play SC2, and P95 to about 80%). Other programs do use idle priority (see my posts above) and they do slow down when you run them together with P95. Therefore, your idea of having a "pause for x minutes" (same as "stop automation for x minutes" of Misfit), would be, of course, welcomed, and very useful. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 2018-10-07 at 11:00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
5×479 Posts |
Here's a relevant suggestion I made a while ago: https://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=14671
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Enhancement request | chris2be8 | GMP-ECM | 0 | 2009-12-08 18:19 |
| Bug? Feature? AND/OR Enhancement Request? | petrw1 | PrimeNet | 2 | 2007-10-16 19:13 |
| Formula entry enhancement? | Xyzzy | GMP-ECM | 5 | 2007-08-22 19:54 |
| Client Enhancement Suggestion(s) | Reboot It | Software | 34 | 2003-05-29 11:31 |