20180302, 19:55  #133  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
10127_{8} Posts 
Quote:
It looks like I'm nearing a point where I'll run a test with RSA130. Thanks for all the help everyone. 

20180302, 21:12  #134 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1057_{16} Posts 
If a moderator is near, could you remove one of my duplicates, please?
Double posting was caused by network troubles. Thanks! 
20180302, 22:12  #135 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5,153 Posts 
If you do get around to running RSA130, consider running it twice; I have a draft of new parameters for C130, and would like an independent tester to confirm my settings are faster than default. If you're interested in helping, please record timings for RSA130 for poly select, sieving, and LA; then do the same for the params file I would send along
I sent settings for 95 to 120 digits in already, and my 120 file was tested to be no faster than CADO's (even though it was faster on my rig, consisting of mostly core2 Xeon cores). Before Real Life got in the way, I was building files for 125, 130, 135 digits. 
20180302, 23:18  #136  
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
2^{3}·3·7^{2} Posts 
Quote:
But if you want to compare yourself this was the poly Code:
n: 1522605027922533360535618378132637429718068114961380688657908494580122963258952897654000350692006139 Y0: 767853202003767126726051 Y1: 984954475843 c0: 106889640063652703788276460 c1: 490217649256458074859 c2: 4687825801522500 c3: 2755578274 c4: 4380 skew: 375657.611 type: gnfs # MurphyE (Bf=1.052e+06,Bg=9.191e+05,area=2.206e+12) = 1.13e08 # f(x) = 4380*x^4+2755578274*x^3+4687825801522500*x^2490217649256458074859*x106889640063652703788276460 # g(x) = 984954475843*x767853202003767126726051 Code:
I 11 lim0 919082 lim1 1051872 lpb0 24 lpb1 25 mfb0 49 mfb1 50 ncurves0 11 ncurves1 16 

20180303, 02:51  #137  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
1000001010111_{2} Posts 
Quote:
Code:
Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): Aggregate statistics: Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): potential collisions: 38210.8 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): raw lognorm (nr/min/av/max/std): 38857/38.650/46.136/49.480/0.866 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): optimized lognorm (nr/min/av/max/std): 38857/37.180/41.522/46.960/1.141 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): Total time: 8294.25 Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Aggregate statistics: Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Total time: 3615.37 Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Rootsieve time: 3613.85 Info:Generate Factor Base: Total cpu/real time for makefb: 51.71/10.7454 Info:Generate Free Relations: Total cpu/real time for freerel: 308.57/40.5473 Info:Lattice Sieving: Aggregate statistics: Info:Lattice Sieving: Total number of relations: 19266332 Info:Lattice Sieving: Average J: 7782.82 for 77739 specialq, max bucket fill: 0.628863 Info:Lattice Sieving: Total CPU time: 321572s Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: Total cpu/real time for dup1: 50.69/114.322 Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: Aggregate statistics: Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: CPU time for dup1: 114.2s Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, removal pass: Total cpu/real time for dup2: 265.52/215.066 Info:Filtering  Singleton removal: Total cpu/real time for purge: 177.43/140.715 Info:Filtering  Merging: Total cpu/real time for merge: 905.7/886.818 Info:Filtering  Merging: Total cpu/real time for replay: 88.94/91.873 Info:Linear Algebra: Total cpu/real time for bwc: 76793.8/0.00016737 Info:Linear Algebra: Aggregate statistics: Info:Linear Algebra: Krylov: WCT time 6213.28 Info:Linear Algebra: Lingen CPU time 511.46, WCT time 77.63 Info:Linear Algebra: Mksol: WCT time 3433.77 Info:Quadratic Characters: Total cpu/real time for characters: 63.27/17.5241 Info:Square Root: Total cpu/real time for sqrt: 2893.31/390.914 Info:HTTP server: Shutting down HTTP server Info:Complete Factorization: Total cpu/elapsed time for entire factorization: 415081/16661.7 I will do another run tomorrow with a set machine list. I am allowing cadonfs to choose the params.c130 file and set all the defaults, except for the few (.ssl, .whitelist, .port) options I've added to the command line call. Will I be replacing the params.c130 file in my parameters/factor folder? 

20180303, 04:11  #138 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5,153 Posts 
It's up to you whether to replace it, or just run the factorization from a file. I'll get you the info Saturday, hopefully!

20180303, 04:33  #139 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
47×89 Posts 
No hurry. I'm tied up for part of Saturday. I may run the first one tomorrow in the morning if I get a chance. Then I can run yours whenever. I would prefer to replace the current .c130 with your new version and use the same command line. That way I'm sure all is the same for the two runs except the parameters.

20180304, 01:47  #140 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
47·89 Posts 
OK, I have a set of machines to use for the comparison. I did have a glitch  one of my core2 Quads either failed to start one process (2 threads) or dropped it early in the run. I will watch that machine for the next test and stop one process if two are running*. All else seemed to run well, finishing at just over 4 hours:
Code:
Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): Aggregate statistics: Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): potential collisions: 38210.8 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): raw lognorm (nr/min/av/max/std): 38857/38.650/46.136/49.480/0.866 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): optimized lognorm (nr/min/av/max/std): 38857/37.180/41.522/46.960/1.141 Info:Polynomial Selection (size optimized): Total time: 8820.95 Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Aggregate statistics: Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Total time: 3256.54 Info:Polynomial Selection (root optimized): Rootsieve time: 3255.06 Info:Generate Factor Base: Total cpu/real time for makefb: 51.91/10.6228 Info:Generate Free Relations: Total cpu/real time for freerel: 309.8/40.0664 Info:Lattice Sieving: Aggregate statistics: Info:Lattice Sieving: Total number of relations: 19363171 Info:Lattice Sieving: Average J: 7781.26 for 78385 specialq, max bucket fill: 0.623386 Info:Lattice Sieving: Total CPU time: 324016s Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: Total cpu/real time for dup1: 51.54/108.384 Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: Aggregate statistics: Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, splitting pass: CPU time for dup1: 108.3s Info:Filtering  Duplicate Removal, removal pass: Total cpu/real time for dup2: 267.44/211.993 Info:Filtering  Singleton removal: Total cpu/real time for purge: 176.36/123.832 Info:Filtering  Merging: Total cpu/real time for merge: 525.71/447.307 Info:Filtering  Merging: Total cpu/real time for replay: 53.04/43.8131 Info:Linear Algebra: Total cpu/real time for bwc: 69859.5/0.000160933 Info:Linear Algebra: Aggregate statistics: Info:Linear Algebra: Krylov: WCT time 5636.19 Info:Linear Algebra: Lingen CPU time 474.24, WCT time 72.75 Info:Linear Algebra: Mksol: WCT time 3116.54 Info:Quadratic Characters: Total cpu/real time for characters: 61.83/17.0987 Info:Square Root: Total cpu/real time for sqrt: 2834.79/384.939 Info:HTTP server: Shutting down HTTP server Info:Complete Factorization: Total cpu/elapsed time for entire factorization: 410286/14660.9 
20180304, 04:32  #141 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
47×89 Posts 
I added more machines and ran RSA110 this evening. I didn't have enough time to run RSA130 again tonight. My CADONFS setup factored RSA110 in just under 17 minutes and all my machines acted as they should have (including the one that didn't earlier):
Code:
Info:Complete Factorization: Total cpu/elapsed time for entire factorization: 41008.1/1005.69 
20180304, 06:53  #142 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5,153 Posts 
Ed
Attached is my draft params.c130 (renamed as a txt for forum compatibility). The timings I'd like from you, for default vs this run: CPU time for poly select (combined size and root, or each individually) CPU time for sieve CPU time for LA CPU and Wall clock time for entire factorization The CADO developer to whom I've been sending these param files wishes for both CPU time and wall clock time to be improved in order to consider the file an improvement on the default. 
20180304, 16:31  #143  
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
47×89 Posts 
Quote:


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
CADONFS on windows  jux  CADONFS  25  20210713 23:53 
CADO help  henryzz  CADONFS  4  20171120 15:14 
CADO and WinBlows  akruppa  Programming  22  20151231 08:37 
CADONFS  skan  Information & Answers  1  20131022 07:00 
CADO  R.D. Silverman  Factoring  4  20081106 12:35 