mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Fun Stuff > Puzzles

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-09-12, 22:11   #1
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

80716 Posts
Default Find the Squares

n = l . m
n = j^2 - k^2

For positive integers j-n

Express j and k in terms of l and m.


Last fiddled with by a1call on 2017-09-12 at 22:14
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 00:13   #2
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
n = l . m
n = j^2 - k^2

For positive integers j-n

Express j and k in terms of l and m.

[TEX]j={l+m\over 2};k={l-m\over 2}[/TEX]
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 00:25   #3
Batalov
 
Batalov's Avatar
 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

100101000001012 Posts
Default

I have a tough one.
I think of three consecutive integer numbers, the sum of which is six.
Can you guess them?

:sarcasm:
Batalov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 00:41   #4
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3·5·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
[TEX]j={l+m\over 2};k={l-m\over 2}[/TEX]
Good job SM.

But I don't think your LateX tags are correct.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 00:47   #5
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

1000000001112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
I have a tough one.
I think of three consecutive integer numbers, the sum of which is six.
Can you guess them?

:sarcasm:
I can only think of a set of 4.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 01:05   #6
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3·5·137 Posts
Default

What would be the solution for
6 = 2 x 3 over the integer domain?
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 01:09   #7
science_man_88
 
science_man_88's Avatar
 
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009
Dumbassville

26×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by a1call View Post
Good job SM.

But I don't think your LateX tags are correct.
j={l+m\over 2};k={l-m\over 2} works outside spoiler tags, just not in them.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-09-13, 01:15   #8
a1call
 
a1call's Avatar
 
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There

3·5·137 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by science_man_88 View Post
j={l+m\over 2};k={l-m\over 2} works outside spoiler tags, just not in them.
May be that's why I have never liked the spoiler tags.
a1call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-27, 13:44   #9
JM Montolio A
 
Feb 2018

25·3 Posts
Smile The product of 3 consecutive numbers is congruent.

1*2*3,

3*4*5,

Also any 3 numbers (d^2)-equidist .

1*5*9,

:-)
JM Montolio A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-02-28, 14:32   #10
Dr Sardonicus
 
Dr Sardonicus's Avatar
 
Feb 2017
Nowhere

4,643 Posts
Default

(posted under the heading The product of 3 consecutive numbers is congruent.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JM Montolio A View Post


1*2*3,

3*4*5,

Also any 3 numbers (d^2)-equidist .

1*5*9,

:-)
Here, "congruent" apparently means, "area of a right triangle with rational sides" -- See Wikipedia Congruent number page. One feature of (rational) congruent numbers is that, due to similar triangles, they are in a sense only defined up to square multipliers. In each class of positive rationals modulo nonzero square rationals, there is a unique representative that is a square free natural number.

For the first assertion, the well known parameterization of sides

2*a*b, a2 - b2, a2 + b2

gives an area of

K = a*b*(a2 - b2) = a*b*(a - b)*(a + b).

Substituting b = 1 gives

K = a*(a - 1)*(a + 1),

the product of three consecutive integers.

I am not sure about the second assertion. However, a congruent number is the common difference in an arithmetic progression of three squares. If

A < B < C

are the (rational) sides of a right triangle, then

(B - A)2, C2, and (B + A)2

form an arithmetic progression with common difference 2*A*B, which is 4 times the area of the triangle. (This formulation was attributed to Frenicle in something I read).

With the 3-4-5 triangle we get the three squares 1, 25, 49 in arithmetic progression.
Dr Sardonicus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-03-01, 10:35   #11
JM Montolio A
 
Feb 2018

11000002 Posts
Post I find times ago that all the form n=pq=r(p+q+r) is congruent.

n = pq = rs = r(p+q+r) ; "s means sum".


trivial proof.
n= 6 = 2*3= 1*(2+3+1). 6 is congruent.
1 x 6
2 x 3
-------
I named that form PQRS. Well, then:
* The product of 3 rationals , (d^2)-equidistanced, is PQRS.
for any d.
* Most, the product of 3 rational d-equidistanced by d, is also PQRS.


And i play to proof. congruent numbers using small Q numbers. I conjectured that any congruent number, multiplied by some square, is a PQRS number.
JM Montolio A is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiplier search to find almost-squares mathPuzzles Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 6 2017-09-18 13:28
Regarding Squares a1call Miscellaneous Math 42 2017-02-03 01:29
Where can I find a Reverse and Add program? I can't find any! Stargate38 Programming 18 2015-07-10 06:08
Perfect squares in NFS paul0 Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 2 2015-01-02 14:21
squares or not squares m_f_h Puzzles 45 2007-06-15 17:46

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:36.


Sat Jul 17 03:36:24 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 1:23, 1 user, load averages: 1.24, 1.76, 1.64

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.