![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Feb 2018
10012 Posts |
Will that save time?
Does each computer automatically avoid redundant calculations? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
24×389 Posts |
Quote:
And it won't count as a double check either. That has to be two different computers from different people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
3·52·11 Posts |
You would only potentially want to do that if you were doing an LL test that would many many years, as a way to detect and correct errors as they happen (otherwise that's years of computation lost). But that's not recommended now even for tests that would take years. The solution now would be to do a PRP test first (which takes roughly as long as LL and has stronger error detection, but technically doesn't prove primality), followed by LL tests if it's shown to be probably prime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
2·3·11·73 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Aug 2002
North San Diego County
68510 Posts |
Makes sense to me. Easy to create "matching" tests when you have access to the full residue. It won't deter a determined individual, as it is easy to create another account.
Last fiddled with by sdbardwick on 2018-02-11 at 11:32 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
170310 Posts |
Quote:
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
981810 Posts |
Practically, you can't. Each step requires the result of the previous one. And to share parts of the process between 2 different machines doesn't work well. The time to communicate data between the machines would slow things down. It is much faster overall to have each machine work on a different number. Prime95 often is limited by how fast the CPU can communicate to the machine's RAM. Communication between machines is normally vastly slower than that.
There are exceptions, but the average user does not have access to the machines that are configured properly. And you would want to be running mlucas, not Prime95. (IIRC) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017
3·52·11 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
13×131 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Test a Specific Exponent in Prime95. When it is 100% done, does it mean I find a new prime number? | king | Information & Answers | 5 | 2018-02-21 18:15 |
| Test a specific exponent with Prime95 | Karl M Johnson | Software | 12 | 2015-10-12 15:56 |
| What if you test an exponent on your own? | LiquidNitrogen | Information & Answers | 2 | 2011-07-03 22:57 |
| Calculation of P90 time for each exponent | bayanne | PrimeNet | 5 | 2006-01-07 15:54 |
| Prime95 on two computers - moving it to one? | Unregistered | PrimeNet | 2 | 2004-09-01 22:39 |