![]() |
|
|
#12 | |||
|
6809 > 6502
"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts
22·2,767 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Both of your blind ignorance and insistence on being right is starting to feel like spam. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Dec 2017
1100102 Posts |
982451707
If anyone is struggling to come up with a prime (for any reason) then you can head below: http://www.primos.mat.br/2T_en.html :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Sep 2003
2·5·7·37 Posts |
Quote:
The number 1,233,333,331 is indeed a prime number but 21,233,333,331−1 has a known factor, although you have to go to Mersenne.ca to see that, because such large numbers beyond 1 billion are beyond present capability for LL testing, and are not recorded by Primenet. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2018-01-02 at 08:45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Dec 2017
2×52 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Sep 2003
2×5×7×37 Posts |
First of all, 982,451,707 is a prime number, but 2982,451,707−1 has a factor, click here
Secondly, take a look at this list of known Mersenne primes, and consider how improbable it is that there would be a gap with no Mersenne primes from roughly 70+ million to nearly 1 billion. Try a little harder to make reasonable guesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Feb 2017
3·5·11 Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for the info/link. I see what Uncwilly was saying now as well. I will stop the current Prime95 process on my computer. Regards Last fiddled with by gophne on 2018-01-02 at 08:57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Dec 2017
2·52 Posts |
First of all, I will try and pick a number that is greater than a billion so they are reasonable (perhaps I should put my previous guesses in the PREDICT M50 thread). I will have my final guess at the end of this post.
Now, here are prime numbers Also, after looking at the 46th and 47th mersenne prime and the gap between both exponents, I consider my previous guess reasonable, but it doesn’t mean anything if M_n is factored, my previous guess being equal to n. So anyway, my final guess is..... Hmmm.... Last fiddled with by George M on 2018-01-02 at 09:29 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Banned
"Luigi"
Aug 2002
Team Italia
5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by ET_ on 2018-01-02 at 09:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Dec 2017
2×52 Posts |
Quote:
Oh, and by the way, perhaps we should put a constraint on our guesses, such that our guesses should be less than 2^32 = 4294967296 ……… It seems like 2^2252945257 - 1 may be prime. It has a probability of 63.7945% of being prime!! We also have another mersenne number with the exact probability: 2^2685457421 - 1. Funny that. Last fiddled with by George M on 2018-01-02 at 10:06 Reason: Should be less than 2^32 because otherwise mersenne.ca can’t compute it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
San Diego, Calif.
32×7×163 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Dec 2017
2×52 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stockfish game: "Move 9 poll", not "move 2^74,207,281-1 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 1 | 2016-10-25 18:03 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 8 poll", not "move 3.14159 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 5 | 2016-10-22 01:55 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 5 poll", not "move 0 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-10-05 15:50 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 4 poll", not "move 100 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-28 19:51 |
| Stockfish game: "Move 2 poll", not "move 2 discussion" | MooMoo2 | Other Chess Games | 0 | 2016-09-19 19:56 |