![]() |
|
|
#177 |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
"Rashid Naimi"
Oct 2015
Remote to Here/There
3·5·137 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#179 | |
|
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×5×7×139 Posts |
Quote:
As someone who has scripts watching the logs, they ignore robots.txt (and they've also said this publiclially). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
265678 Posts |
My slowpoke Mlucas-avx2 run @4096K - started more or less as a backup to ATH's AWS run, in case he hit any instance-related issues - is 72 hours in, ETA = 12h, but no reason to delay the announcement for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#181 |
|
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
36·13 Posts |
Hmm.
Then there is no need to calculate the residue with start value s0=10, neither. Ever. See page 63 of the PDF. The theorem 9.1 from Jansen (a.k.a. Woltman conjecture) is often misquoted as that ε4 and ε10 are equal when p={5 or 7} mod 8, but it says instead ε4 ▪ ε10 = 1 ↔ p={5 or 7} mod 8 (except p==5), that is: ε10 = ε4 ▪ ((p%8>=5) ? 1 : -1) (except p==5) |
|
|
|
|
|
#182 | |
|
"Patrik Johansson"
Aug 2002
Uppsala, Sweden
52·17 Posts |
Quote:
It was quite an educational exercise and it gave me some "hands on" experience of counting Mersenne numbers: I already realized that I must only take the prime exponents, then that I could save time by excluding the exponents that had had a test on Dec 23, and finally that I had missed that there are a lot of numbers with small factors, so that I could save even more time by downloading the factored numbers (to be able to skip them). Also, it gave me an opportunity to use the gmp library again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#183 | |
|
Sep 2003
5×11×47 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
103·113 Posts |
FYI, Andreas (ATH) kindly gave me access to the AWS c5.9xlarge instance on which he completed his Mlucas run @4608K - he started on a mix of C4 and C5.18xlarge (and started with the slower avx2 build due to compile problems with the Mlucas 17.1 release in avx512 mode), and only late in the verify found the c5.9xlarge gave him slightly better speeds than the c5.18xlarge at half the price. I wanted to test his avx-512 build @4096K, as well - long story short, I got a best time of 2.4 msec/iter at that smaller FFT length on the c5.9xlarge, i.e. his verify would have needed just a little over 48 hours had it used that setup for the whole run. Looks like it's time for me to set up a user account for AWS. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#185 | |
|
"David"
Jul 2015
Ohio
11·47 Posts |
Quote:
So are you telling me it is time to upgrade the kit? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#186 |
|
∂2ω=0
Sep 2002
República de California
103×113 Posts |
Not at all, though with all the bubble-priced *coins you've been mining using your GPU farm, you should be flush. :)
Your Xeon is doing just fine for my F30 run, where I want the speeds of my 2 runs (one on 32-core Xeon, one on 64-core KNL) to be reasonably close to each other. But for short-time occasional work, like, say, the next M-prime verify, AWS rent-a-beast is a great way to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#187 | |
|
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
63578 Posts |
Quote:
The NC6s_v3 is currently showing up at $1.53/hr and if it took something like 30 hours (am I even close? No idea...) then we're talking $46 USD for a rapid verification run. I sure thought that'd be a cool use of my $200 credit on my personal account but oh well. Maybe next time. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Merry Christmas everyone ... | petrw1 | Lounge | 26 | 2013-01-02 23:01 |
| Merry Christmas Everyone | petrw1 | Lounge | 1 | 2010-12-25 07:54 |
| Merry Christmas Everyone.... | petrw1 | Lounge | 8 | 2009-12-25 16:09 |
| Merry Christmas | henryzz | Lounge | 10 | 2007-12-26 21:34 |
| Merry Christmas! | Prime95 | Lounge | 17 | 2006-12-26 19:31 |