![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,739 Posts |
I have checked out the new LLR35 (12/27/04). I ran the dynamic linux version on a P4 and on an Athlon, both passing about 700 double-checks against "the original LLR" each at about n=260000 -- no errors
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
May 2004
FRANCE
22×5×29 Posts |
Quote:
Jean |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Feb 2003
35648 Posts |
I've tested the new LLR35 on a 2GHz Opteron.
To get an idea about how the non-SSE2 functions compare in speed to the SSE2 functions, I played a bit with the "CpuSupportsSSE2" switch. Here are the timings (while testing 3*2^1572660-1): SSE2 enabled: 4.186 ms/iteration SSE2 disabled: 4.275 ms/iteration You see that the time/iteration using the non-SSE2 library is very close to that of the SSE2 library, only about 2% more. This is a great break-through for the Athlon users and the Athlons do not need to fear comparison with the P4s any longer! Thank you very much, George and Jean! -- Thomas |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,739 Posts |
During my tests I saw:
0.4 milli-seconds per iteration on the P4 @ 2.47 GHz 0.7 milli-seconds per iteration on the XP2200 @ 1.8 GHz making Athlons competative at LLR. Once we have finshed sieving at the end of 2005, I will be putting my Athlons on LLR. Athlon users:
Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2005-01-05 at 19:29 Reason: seconds should have read milli-seconds |
|
|