![]() |
|
|
#12 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
753510 Posts |
I'm betting the cause is the 12-hour Jacobi timer and 30-minute save file timer fired at roughly the same time. Both of them will create a save file.
I'm not sure what to do about that, I'll think on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Sep 2003
5·11·47 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Sep 2003
5·11·47 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
p81419599: [Sep 09 04:11] LL (mprime): 2014496 / 81419599 [2.47%] p81419599.bu: [Sep 09 03:41] LL (mprime): 1877683 / 81419599 [2.31%] p81419599.bu2: [Sep 09 03:11] LL (mprime): 1740860 / 81419599 [2.14%] p81419599.bu3: [Sep 09 00:12] LL (mprime): 922855 / 81419599 [1.13%] Code:
p82062787: [Sep 09 04:31] LL (mprime): 24609328 / 82062787 [29.99%] p82062787.bu: [Sep 09 04:21] LL (mprime): 24562904 / 82062787 [29.93%] p82062787.bu2: [Sep 09 04:11] LL (mprime): 24516461 / 82062787 [29.88%] p82062787.bu3: [Sep 09 00:12] LL (mprime): 23405854 / 82062787 [28.52%] p82062787.bu4: [Sep 08 12:07] LL (mprime): 20072393 / 82062787 [24.46%] So we see that the traditional three save files (no suffix, .bu, and .bu2) are separated by intervals of DiskWriteTime, whereas the .bu3 and higher seem to linger longer, and have timestamps separated by 12 hours from one another if there is more than one of them. In each case, one of the two savefiles with a matching timestamp disappeared and the other remained. So probably one of them was created by the 12-hour Jacobi timer and the other by the DiskWriteTime-interval timer, as you surmised. In the other three cases, it seems that only the Jacobi timer wrote a savefile at that particular point in time (Sept 9 00:12 UTC, or in one case, at Sep 08 23:43): Code:
p26S2579: [Sep 09 04:43] LL (mprime): 4702545 / 78262579 [6.01%] p26S2579.bu: [Sep 09 04:33] LL (mprime): 4656412 / 78262579 [5.95%] p26S2579.bu2: [Sep 09 04:23] LL (mprime): 4610259 / 78262579 [5.89%] p26S2579.bu3: [Sep 08 23:43] LL (mprime): 3321337 / 78262579 [4.24%] Code:
p81471113: [Sep 09 04:41] LL (mprime): 28813951 / 81471113 [35.37%] p81471113.bu: [Sep 09 04:31] LL (mprime): 28768075 / 81471113 [35.31%] p81471113.bu2: [Sep 09 04:21] LL (mprime): 28722214 / 81471113 [35.25%] p81471113.bu3: [Sep 09 00:12] LL (mprime): 27578749 / 81471113 [33.85%] p81471113.bu4: [Sep 08 12:08] LL (mprime): 24285228 / 81471113 [29.81%] Code:
p28S7887: [Sep 09 04:51] LL (mprime): 67752399 / 78287887 [86.54%] p28S7887.bu: [Sep 09 04:41] LL (mprime): 67708486 / 78287887 [86.49%] p28S7887.bu2: [Sep 09 04:31] LL (mprime): 67664630 / 78287887 [86.43%] p28S7887.bu3: [Sep 09 00:12] LL (mprime): 66526121 / 78287887 [84.98%] p28S7887.bu4: [Sep 08 12:09] LL (mprime): 63372973 / 78287887 [80.95%] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
5×11×137 Posts |
Quote:
I'm going to change the meaning of the 12-hour JacobiError timer. Instead of meaning "error check and write save file now" it will mean "run an error check before writing the next save file". Not a big difference. Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2017-09-09 at 19:17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Sep 2006
Brussels, Belgium
32458 Posts |
The Jacobi test does nor run just twice per 24 hours, it also runs at each start of the program.
Jacob |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
11101011011112 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2·1,579 Posts |
29.3 have the same problem for me as 29.2, I guess my computer does not work well with hwloc. After 5+ benchmarks at 4M FFT, the performance is about the same (almost) as 28.9. But starting just 1 thread of something else makes performance drop a lot, several times what it should from that one thread, and it is not constant performance, the speed varies a lot. Any chance the old way of running the threads could be left in as an option in undoc.txt?
I hope it is just my computer and other people does not have this problem without realizing it, because then using your computer for other things while running Prime95 will hurt performance a lot. Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-09-11 at 20:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
5×11×137 Posts |
Very strange. Have you tried changing each worker to "run on any core" using the Affinity= option in undoc.txt.
Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2017-09-11 at 21:28 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
2×1,579 Posts |
"EnableSetAffinity=0" actually solved all my problems. Now 29.3 runs as good as 28.9 with and without extra applications. What does EnableSetAffinity=0 actually do?
And what does EnableSetPriority=0 do? It seems to set priority of Prime95 to Normal instead of Idle? I'm going to leave it at EnableSetPriority=1. Btw, did you find a way to use the Jacobi check on normal LL tests not just 3-PRP tests? Because it is running Jacobi test in 29.3 on a normal "Test=" worktodo.txt line, or are all tests now 3-PRP tests instead of actual LL tests? Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-09-12 at 17:56 |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
5×11×137 Posts |
EnableSetAffinity=0 disables all attempts at setting affinity. Essentially this is equivalent to "run on any core".
Jacobi error checks are for LL tests. This is implemented 29.3. Gerbicz error checks are for PRP tests. This is not implemented yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Dec 2011
After milion nines:)
1,451 Posts |
I noticed one cosmetic error
At the end of PRP test always was We4, but now is Wf4 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Prime95 version 27.3 | Prime95 | Software | 148 | 2012-03-18 19:24 |
| Prime95 version 26.3 | Prime95 | Software | 76 | 2010-12-11 00:11 |
| Prime95 version 25.5 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 369 | 2008-02-26 05:21 |
| Prime95 version 25.4 | Prime95 | PrimeNet | 143 | 2007-09-24 21:01 |
| When the next prime95 version ? | pacionet | Software | 74 | 2006-12-07 20:30 |