Sierp base 3 reservations/statuses/primes - Page 30

MisterBitcoin · 2017-06-03, 20:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Out of curiosity, what did you use to test this range, i.e. cores, CPU, etc?

CPU: Intel® Xeon® E3-1230v3 (HT active)
Cores 4x3,3 GHz

Used srbsieve plus two cllr threads in the same time.

rogue · 2017-06-10, 20:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

CPU: Intel® Xeon® E3-1230v3 (HT active)
Cores 4x3,3 GHz

Used srbsieve plus two cllr threads in the same time.

Taking 120G to the end.

rogue · 2017-07-04, 23:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by rogue

Taking 120G to the end.

Completed to n=25000. k without a prime are attached. I'll send Gary a link to the other files.

FYI, this was done on a 6-core machine and the work was spread across 10 instances of srbsieve.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-07-08, 07:45

So, lets make a multi-year reservation. :)

Reserving k-range 15G-17G to n=25K using srbsieve. (estimated time: 2,5 months)
Reserving k-range 120G> to n=100K. (estimated time: 1> years due to 32K k´s remain)

Now I have enough time to make a longer vacation.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-08-21, 18:30

Please dont cut off my head, but I had to post an update on S3.

k-Range 125G reached n=50K, there are 157 k´s remain in this range.
The .res files are attached.

The other 4G are atm now tested up to n=30/35K. Updates on each range if they hit 50K.

Anyway: Do you need the cllr-results for this base?

(The primes are splitted in 6 files, for each n-range 1 file. First of all i decided to generate 1 sieve file for all 32K k´s, but stopped this idea when llr reached n=26K. The file was undersieved.)

I need to add this:

Code:

08/04/17 23:22:14 removed candidate sequence 125050976086*3^n+1 from the sieve

The ck was also in the pl_remain, just saying.

gd_barnes · 2017-08-22, 00:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

Please dont cut off my head, but I had to post an update on S3.

k-Range 125G reached n=50K, there are 157 k´s remain in this range.
The .res files are attached.

The other 4G are atm now tested up to n=30/35K. Updates on each range if they hit 50K.

Anyway: Do you need the cllr-results for this base?

(The primes are splitted in 6 files, for each n-range 1 file. First of all i decided to generate 1 sieve file for all 32K k´s, but stopped this idea when llr reached n=26K. The file was undersieved.)

I need to add this:

Code:

08/04/17 23:22:14 removed candidate sequence 125050976086*3^n+1 from the sieve

The ck was also in the pl_remain, just saying.

No you don't have to post a status on S3.

This is a mess.

There is no attached file.

Nearly the whole posting is confusing. Questions:

"125G" is not a k-range. Is the k-range for k>125G or is it k=124G-125G?

You say that the other 4G is at n=30K-35K. What is the other 4G? Is that k=120G-124G? 121G-125G? Regardless why report a status for a random n-range that is completed to somewhere between n=30K and 35K? That means nothing.

You say the .res file is attached. Then you ask if we need the cllr-results file for this base. Why attach a results file and then ask if we need a results file? That is funny. To answer the question: Yes we need a results (residues) file on all bases for n>25K only.

Reference the conjectured k in the remaining file. That should not be there. I will remove it.

Please do not report statuses at random completion ranges like this on large-conjectured bases. Wait until you are done with a specific k-range to n=100K -or- report the entire k-range complete to n=50K. Otherwise it is a large waste of admin time.

Come on. I know you can do better than this.

Edit: Reference your previous post: The greater than sign goes to to the left of the number, i.e. k>120G and estimate time > 1 year. 120G> is meaningless.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-08-22, 17:05

If the post says "attached", there should be an file...sigh
This are the primes for k´s above 125G; the primes for k 120G up to 125G will follow if that range will hit n=50K. (atm primes: 1,975)

(I just named the range 125G, because I cant add ">" to a file name)

gd_barnes · 2017-08-24, 04:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

If the post says "attached", there should be an file...sigh
This are the primes for k´s above 125G; the primes for k 120G up to 125G will follow if that range will hit n=50K. (atm primes: 1,975)

(I just named the range 125G, because I cant add ">" to a file name)

OK just a note: There are primes only files. I will need the residues files for all n>25K.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-08-24, 13:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

OK just a note: There are primes only files. I will need the residues files for all n>25K.

I´ll send them when this range (>125G) will reach n=100K via mail.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-08-29, 16:13

Range 15-17G reached n=25K, 12092 k´s remain.
Files will be mailed after zipping is done, ~2 hrs.

Reserving Range 17G-19G to n=25K.

MisterBitcoin · 2017-09-02, 18:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin

Range 15-17G reached n=25K, 12092 k´s remain.
Files will be mailed after zipping is done, ~2 hrs.

Reserving Range 17G-19G to n=25K.

Did you received the files?

2017-08-21, 18:30	#324
MisterBitcoin "Nuri, the dragon :P" Jul 2016 Good old Germany 1453₈ Posts	Please dont cut off my head, but I had to post an update on S3. k-Range 125G reached n=50K, there are 157 k´s remain in this range. The .res files are attached. The other 4G are atm now tested up to n=30/35K. Updates on each range if they hit 50K. Anyway: Do you need the cllr-results for this base? (The primes are splitted in 6 files, for each n-range 1 file. First of all i decided to generate 1 sieve file for all 32K k´s, but stopped this idea when llr reached n=26K. The file was undersieved.) I need to add this: Code: 08/04/17 23:22:14 removed candidate sequence 1250509760863^n+1 from the sieve The ck was also in the pl_remain, just saying. Last fiddled with by MisterBitcoin on 2017-08-21 at 18:35*

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes	KEP	Conjectures 'R Us	1107	2021-07-26 18:37
Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	2300	2021-07-25 07:38
Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	1397	2021-07-25 07:07
Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	905	2021-07-18 16:55
Bases 33-100 reservations/statuses/primes	Siemelink	Conjectures 'R Us	1691	2021-07-06 18:50

2017-07-08, 07:45	#323
MisterBitcoin "Nuri, the dragon :P" Jul 2016 Good old Germany 811 Posts	So, lets make a multi-year reservation. :) Reserving k-range 15G-17G to n=25K using srbsieve. (estimated time: 2,5 months) Reserving k-range 120G> to n=100K. (estimated time: 1> years due to 32K k´s remain) Now I have enough time to make a longer vacation.

2017-08-29, 16:13	#329
MisterBitcoin "Nuri, the dragon :P" Jul 2016 Good old Germany 811 Posts	Range 15-17G reached n=25K, 12092 k´s remain. Files will be mailed after zipping is done, ~2 hrs. Reserving Range 17G-19G to n=25K.